Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...

Compacting Factor test

Compacting Factor test

The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...

Two-Way ANOVA

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Vineland-3 Structural Validity and Interpretability of Domain Scores: Implications for Practitioners Assessing Adolescents With Developmental Conditions.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities·2021

Same author

Utility of the CBCL DSM-Oriented Scales in Assessing Emotional Disorders in Youth with Autism.

Research in autism spectrum disorders·2017

Same author

Validity Study of the CBCL 6-18 for the Assessment of Emotional Problems in Youth With ASD.

Journal of mental health research in intellectual disabilities·2014

Same author

High prevalence of sleep disorders and associated comorbidities in a community sample of children with Down syndrome.

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine·2014

Same author

A community cross-sectional survey of medical problems in 440 children with Down syndrome in New York State.

The Journal of pediatrics·2013

Same author

An initial evaluation of the Social Communication Questionnaire for the assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children with Down syndrome.

Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Constructs assessed by the GARS-2: factor analysis of data from the standardization sample.

Vincent Pandolfi¹, Caroline I Magyar, Charles A Dill

¹School Psychology Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. vxpgla@rit.edu

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

|February 13, 2010

Summary

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) subscales lack validity, suggesting caution when interpreting its Autism Index. Empirically derived factors may also have limited clinical utility.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

Psychometrics
Developmental Psychology
Clinical Psychology

Background:

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a frequently used tool for autism screening.
The validity of its three conceptual subscales has not been previously assessed.
Understanding the psychometric properties of autism screening tools is crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the construct validity of the GARS-2 subscales using factor analysis.
To determine if the GARS-2 subscale structure is supported by empirical data.
To assess the clinical utility of the GARS-2 and its derived scales.

Main Methods:

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a subsample (n=496) of the GARS-2 standardization data.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed on a matched replication subsample (n=494).
Statistical analyses aimed to identify underlying factor structures within the GARS-2 item responses.

Main Results:

Factor analyses did not support the existing three-subscale structure of the GARS-2.
EFA identified a four-factor structure: stereotyped/repetitive behavior, stereotyped/idiosyncratic language, word use problems, and social impairment.
CFA confirmed the four-factor model in the independent replication sample.

Conclusions:

The conceptual subscales of the GARS-2 demonstrate limited clinical utility.
The Autism Index derived from the GARS-2 should be interpreted with caution due to structural limitations.
Further research is needed to refine the GARS-2 and explore the utility of empirically derived scales, considering item content and test development.