Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of the Theoretical Domains Framework to Investigate Factors Influencing Pediatric Fever Management Practices and Antipyretic Use in Australian Emergency Departments.

Pediatric emergency care·2026
Same author

A differentiated nasal epithelial cell model derived from children with acute wheeze and asthma.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2025
Same author

Co-design and evaluation of a regional and rural translation bronchiolitis platform: study protocol.

Pediatric research·2025
Same author

Efficacy of oral corticosteroids for acute preschool wheeze: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine·2024
Same author

Sedation and Analgesia for Reduction of Pediatric Ileocolic Intussusception.

JAMA network open·2023
Same author

Qualitative study of emergency clinicians to inform a national guideline on the management of children with mild-to-moderate head injuries.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Best Guess method: a further external validation study and comparison with other methods.

Julian Casey1, Meredith Borland

  • 1Emergency Department, Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. juliancasey@iinet.net.au

Emergency Medicine Australasia : EMA
|February 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The "Best Guess" weight estimation method is accurate for children, especially those aged 1-4 years. While it slightly overestimates weight in other age groups, it is more precise than the APLS and Broselow methods.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Assessment Tools
  • Biometric Estimation

Background:

  • Accurate weight estimation is crucial for pediatric emergency care.
  • Existing methods like APLS and Broselow have limitations in accuracy and precision.
  • The 'Best Guess' method offers a potential alternative for rapid weight assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the 'Best Guess' weight estimation method in a diverse pediatric population.
  • To compare the accuracy and precision of 'Best Guess' against the APLS and Broselow methods.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods across different age groups.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cross-sectional study involving 1235 children aged 0-14 years.
  • Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, height, and actual weight.
  • Analysis focused on percentage error and the proportion of errors exceeding 20%.

Main Results:

  • 'Best Guess' was most accurate (mean error +1.69% in 1-4 year olds), with moderate overestimation in other age groups.
  • Broselow method showed the highest precision (underestimating weight, mean error -5.28% to -7.24%).
  • APLS method was least accurate and precise (mean error -12.61% to -17.36%).

Conclusions:

  • The 'Best Guess' method demonstrates good accuracy in pediatric weight estimation, particularly for young children.
  • Broselow offers better precision, while APLS is the least reliable.
  • Ease of use supports wider adoption of Broselow in emergency settings.