Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk assessment for canine periodontal disease using a hybrid causal Bayesian network.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Response: "Letter to the Editor: Lessons to Be Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Further Ideas".

International journal of public health·2026
Same author

What Lessons can Be Learned From the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

International journal of public health·2025
Same author

A Bayesian Network model of pregnancy outcomes for England and Wales.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Attitudes towards technology supported rheumatoid arthritis care: investigating patient- and clinician-perceived opportunities and barriers.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2023
Same author

A causal Bayesian network approach for consumer product safety and risk assessment.

Journal of safety research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Comparing risks of alternative medical diagnosis using Bayesian arguments.

Norman Fenton1, Martin Neil

  • 1Queen Mary University of London, RADAR (Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis Research), School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, UK. norman@dcs.qmul.ac.uk

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
|February 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Bayes Theorem and Bayesian networks can clarify medical negligence cases. Visualizing these complex Bayesian arguments makes them accessible, aiding medical decision-making and informed consent.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Biostatistics
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Medical negligence cases often involve complex risk-benefit analyses.
  • Bayes Theorem and Bayesian networks offer a framework for probabilistic reasoning in medicine.
  • Traditional presentation of Bayesian concepts can be a barrier to understanding for non-specialists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the application of Bayes Theorem and Bayesian networks in a medical negligence case.
  • To explore methods for presenting complex Bayesian arguments visually and accessibly.
  • To highlight the implications for medical decision-making, informed consent, and error analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a medical negligence case involving a stroke after an invasive diagnostic test.
  • Exploration of visual representation techniques for Bayesian arguments.
  • Discussion of the 'true positive' vs. 'false positive' issue in diagnostic testing.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian networks can elucidate the decision-making process in medical negligence.
  • Visual, non-mathematical presentations of Bayesian arguments are feasible and effective.
  • This approach can improve understanding of risk, consent, and liability.

Conclusions:

  • Visualizing Bayesian reasoning can demystify complex medical-legal scenarios.
  • Accessible Bayesian methods can enhance medical decision-making and patient care.
  • The approach has broad applicability in various medical decision-making contexts.