Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Cancer Surgery: Clinical Evidence and Biological Rationale.

Transfusion medicine reviews·2026
Same author

Helping Underdeveloped Lungs with Cells (HULC-2): mesenchymal stromal cells in extreme preterm infants at risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia - a study protocol of a phase 2 multicentre double blind randomised controlled trial in Canada.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Protocol for a SPIRIT extension for reporting Pragmatic and Explanatory trial protocols designed using the PRECIS tool. (SPIRIT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Protocol for a CONSORT extension for reporting Pragmatic and Explanatory trials designed using the PRECIS tool. (CONSORT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Hospital Policy of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Transfusion in Major Noncardiac Surgery.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same journal

The sequential cohort randomized clinical trial: A study design for community-engaged clinical research in a rural American Indian community.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Rationale, design, and statistical analysis plan for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Limosilactobacillus reuteri to support mother-infant bonding and maternal socioemotional functioning in postpartum women at increased risk for postpartum depression.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of clinical trial recruitment strategies in a safety-net hospital.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Are older adult research participants representative of the general population? Results from 19 clinical studies at one academic research center.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Multi-site feasibility of a web-based and telephone navigation intervention to connect lung cancer caregivers in community oncology settings with resources: Protocol for the WF-2301CD Caregiver Oncology Needs Evaluation Tool (CONNECT) trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same journal

Rationale and design of a CArdiac rehabilitation program on the prevention of CardioTOXicity in breast Cancer patients undergoing treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab (CARPTOX-BC) trial: A randomized, active control group, open-label trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research.

Jamie C Brehaut1, Dean A Fergusson, Jonathan Kimmelman

  • 1Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. jbrehaut@ohri.ca

Contemporary Clinical Trials
|February 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision aids can enhance clinical research informed consent. These tools improve participant understanding and decision-making quality, addressing current process limitations.

More Related Videos

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Patient Decision Making
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Current informed consent processes in clinical research often prioritize documentation over decision quality.
  • Research on improving informed consent is frequently ad hoc and lacks theoretical grounding.
  • Key aspects like participant comprehension in informed consent are unclearly defined and measured.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose decision aids as a method to improve the informed consent process for clinical research.
  • To leverage the strengths of decision aids in areas where informed consent practices are weak.
  • To address limitations in current informed consent procedures by integrating decision-making support.

Main Methods:

  • Decision aids, proven effective in treatment decisions, are explored for application in study participation.
  • Decision aids integrate clear documentation, decision-making exercises, and consultation.
  • Research on decision aids utilizes theory-based approaches and empirically derived standards.

Main Results:

  • Decision aids demonstrably improve participant knowledge of key decision aspects.
  • They foster accurate perceptions of outcome probabilities among participants.
  • Decision aids help align participant choices with their preferred outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Decision aids offer a structured approach to enhance the quality of informed consent in clinical research.
  • Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of decision aids in improving the informed consent process.
  • Implementing decision aids could lead to more robust and ethically sound clinical trial participation.