Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
An actuarial approach to comparing early stage and late stage lung cancer mortality and survival
Sara W Goldberg1, James L Mulshine, Dale Hagstrom
1Milliman, Inc., Consultants and Actuaries, 1 Penn Plaza, Floor 38 New York, NY 10119, USA. Sara.Goldberg@milliman.com
Abstract:
Comparing the mortality characteristics of different cohorts is an essential process in the life insurance industry. Pseudodisease, lead-time bias, and length bias, which are critical to determining the value of cancer screening, have close analogues in life insurance company management, including the temporal impact of underwriting. Ratios of all-cause mortality rates for cancer cohorts relative to standard population mortality rates can provide insights into early stage and late stage mortality differences, differences by age, sex, race, and histology, and allow modeling of biases associated with early stage detection or screening protocols. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data set has characteristics that allow efficient application of actuarial techniques. We show the mortality burden associated with treated early stage lung cancer and that identifying all lung cancers at early stage could reduce US lung cancer deaths by over 70,000 per year.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Life Tables
