Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...

Emerging Adulthood

Emerging Adulthood

Jeffrey Arnett's concept of emerging adulthood offers a framework to understand the unique developmental stage between adolescence and full-fledged adulthood, generally from ages 18 to 25. This period is marked by extensive exploration and shifts in identity, relationships, and career choices, a process known in psychology as role experimentation. Emerging adulthood reflects the evolving cultural expectations surrounding adulthood and the dynamic process of personal transformation during this...

Growth versus Fixed Mindset

Growth versus Fixed Mindset

Carol Dweck introduced the term mindset to describe individuals' beliefs about their intellectual and personal capabilities. These beliefs significantly influence psychological processes such as motivation, goal-setting, and perseverance, ultimately shaping academic and life outcomes. Individuals generally possess one of two mindsets- a fixed or a growth mindset—each promoting different responses to success, failure, and challenge.Fixed vs. Growth MindsetA fixed mindset assumes that one's...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: patients' experience and satisfaction with different service models.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026

Same author

Correction: Health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: A 6-year follow-up.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2026

Same author

Associations Between Cognitive Risk Scores and Objective Cognition by Sexual Orientation: Evidence From the CLSA.

Research on aging·2026

Same author

Visual motion contrast thresholds in the periphery predict older drivers' behavior at intersections.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026

Same author

Health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: A 6-year follow-up.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2025

Same author

Factors Influencing Transitions from Driver to Non-Driver: Evidence from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Canadian journal on aging = La revue canadienne du vieillissement·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

Comparative optimism among drivers: an intergenerational portrait.

Dominique Gosselin¹, Sylvain Gagnon, Arne Stinchcombe

¹School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 145 Jean-Jacques Lussier Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.

Accident; Analysis and Prevention

|February 18, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

All drivers exhibit comparative optimism (CO) about car crash risk, especially when comparing themselves to older drivers. Young males show higher CO than young females.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters

Published on: November 22, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Area of Science:

Psychology
Traffic Safety
Behavioral Science

Background:

Comparative optimism (CO) is a cognitive bias where individuals perceive their risk of experiencing negative events as lower than that of others.
Understanding CO in the context of driving is crucial for developing effective road safety interventions.
Previous research has explored CO across different age groups, but a detailed examination of driving-related risks across multiple cohorts is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate comparative optimism (CO) concerning car crash risk across three distinct age cohorts: young adults (17-26), middle-aged adults (27-64), and older adults (65+).
To examine how CO levels vary when individuals compare their personal risk to different age groups (young, middle-aged, older drivers).
To identify potential gender differences in CO among young drivers.

Main Methods:

A large cross-sectional study was conducted with participants from three age cohorts.
Participants completed a questionnaire assessing their perceived personal risk of at-fault car crashes across nine driving-related scenarios.
Self-reported risks were compared against perceived risks of young, middle-aged, and older drivers.

Main Results:

All three age groups demonstrated significant comparative optimism (CO) regarding car crash risk.
The level of CO varied depending on the age group used for comparison.
CO was consistently higher when participants compared their risk to that of older drivers.
Young males exhibited greater CO than young females when assessing their crash risk.

Conclusions:

Comparative optimism is a prevalent bias across different age groups concerning driving safety.
Perceived risk and optimism are influenced by the age of the comparison group, with older drivers serving as a common benchmark for lower perceived risk.
Targeted interventions may be necessary to address gender-specific differences in risk perception among young drivers.