Economic analysis: randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Penelope A Bradbury1, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour

  • 1NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Erlotinib offers improved survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients but is costly. Identifying subgroups like never-smokers may enhance cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • The BR.21 trial evaluated erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Erlotinib demonstrated improved overall survival and quality of life compared to placebo.
  • Access to erlotinib is limited globally due to funding restrictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct an economic analysis of erlotinib treatment within the BR.21 trial.
  • To explore molecular and clinical predictors of outcome for erlotinib treatment.
  • To determine the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in various patient populations.

Main Methods:

  • Resource utilization data from the BR.21 trial (731 patients) were analyzed.
  • Costs included erlotinib, diagnostics, hospitalizations, adverse events, and other therapies.
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using life-years gained (LYG).

Main Results:

  • The ICER for erlotinib was $94,638 per life-year gained.
  • Key factors influencing cost-effectiveness were survival benefit magnitude and erlotinib cost.
  • Subgroup analyses indicated potentially higher cost-effectiveness in never-smokers and patients with high EGFR gene copy number.

Conclusions:

  • Erlotinib treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer is marginally cost-effective at $94,638 per LYG.
  • Utilizing molecular predictors can help identify patient subgroups with varying cost-effectiveness for targeted therapies.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...