Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Economic analysis: randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Penelope A Bradbury1, Dongsheng Tu, Lesley Seymour
1NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Background:
The NCIC Clinical Trials Group conducted the BR.21 trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of erlotinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This trial accrued patients between August 14, 2001, and January 31, 2003, and found that overall survival and quality of life were improved in the erlotinib arm than in the placebo arm. However, funding restrictions limit access to erlotinib in many countries. We undertook an economic analysis of erlotinib treatment in this trial and explored different molecular and clinical predictors of outcome to determine the cost-effectiveness of treating various populations with erlotinib.
Methods:
Resource utilization was determined from individual patient data in the BR.21 trial database. The trial recruited 731 patients (488 in the erlotinib arm and 243 in the placebo arm). Costs arising from erlotinib treatment, diagnostic tests, outpatient visits, acute hospitalization, adverse events, lung cancer-related concomitant medications, transfusions, and radiation therapy were captured. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as the ratio of incremental cost (in 2007 Canadian dollars) to incremental effectiveness (life-years gained). In exploratory analyses, we evaluated the benefits of treatment in selected subgroups to determine the impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Results:
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for erlotinib treatment in the BR.21 trial population was $94,638 per life-year gained (95% confidence interval = $52,359 to $429,148). The major drivers of cost-effectiveness included the magnitude of survival benefit and erlotinib cost. Subgroup analyses revealed that erlotinib may be more cost-effective in never-smokers or patients with high EGFR gene copy number.
Conclusion:
With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $94 638 per life-year gained, erlotinib treatment for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer is marginally cost-effective. The use of molecular predictors of benefit for targeted agents may help identify more or less cost-effective subgroups for treatment.
Insights
Erlotinib offers improved survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients but is costly. Identifying subgroups like never-smokers may enhance cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
Background:
- The BR.21 trial evaluated erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
- Erlotinib demonstrated improved overall survival and quality of life compared to placebo.
- Access to erlotinib is limited globally due to funding restrictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an economic analysis of erlotinib treatment within the BR.21 trial.
- To explore molecular and clinical predictors of outcome for erlotinib treatment.
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in various patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Resource utilization data from the BR.21 trial (731 patients) were analyzed.
- Costs included erlotinib, diagnostics, hospitalizations, adverse events, and other therapies.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using life-years gained (LYG).
Main Results:
- The ICER for erlotinib was $94,638 per life-year gained.
- Key factors influencing cost-effectiveness were survival benefit magnitude and erlotinib cost.
- Subgroup analyses indicated potentially higher cost-effectiveness in never-smokers and patients with high EGFR gene copy number.
Conclusions:
- Erlotinib treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer is marginally cost-effective at $94,638 per LYG.
- Utilizing molecular predictors can help identify patient subgroups with varying cost-effectiveness for targeted therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Cancer Survival Analysis