Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Wind Tunnel Experiments to Study Chaparral Crown Fires
Published on: November 14, 2017
Testing the hypothesis of fire use for ecosystem management by neanderthal and upper palaeolithic modern human
Anne-Laure Daniau1, Francesco d'Errico, Maria Fernanda Sánchez Goñi
1EPHE, CNRS UMR5805, EPOC, Université Bordeaux 1, Talence, France. al.daniau@bristol.ac.uk
Background:
It has been proposed that a greater control and more extensive use of fire was one of the behavioral innovations that emerged in Africa among early Modern Humans, favouring their spread throughout the world and determining their eventual evolutionary success. We would expect, if extensive fire use for ecosystem management were a component of the modern human technical and cognitive package, as suggested for Australia, to find major disturbances in the natural biomass burning variability associated with the colonisation of Europe by Modern Humans.
Methodology/Principal Findings:
Analyses of microcharcoal preserved in two deep-sea cores located off Iberia and France were used to reconstruct changes in biomass burning between 70 and 10 kyr cal BP. Results indicate that fire regime follows the Dansgaard-Oeschger climatic variability and its impacts on fuel load. No major disturbance in natural fire regime variability is observed at the time of the arrival of Modern Humans in Europe or during the remainder of the Upper Palaeolithic (40-10 kyr cal BP).
Conclusions/Significance:
Results indicate that either Neanderthals and Modern humans did not influence fire regime or that, if they did, their respective influence was comparable at a regional scale, and not as pronounced as that observed in the biomass burning history of Southeast Asia.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
What is Evolutionary History?
Biodiversity and Human Values
The Fossil Record
Overview of Archaea
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
