Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay: Simultaneous Fluorogenic Measurement of Thrombin and Plasmin Generation in a Single Well
Published on: February 27, 2026
Improvements in factor VIII inhibitor detection: From Bethesda to Nijmegen
Bert Verbruggen1, Waander L van Heerde, Britta A P Laros-van Gorkom
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. h.verbruggen@chl.umcn.nl
Abstract:
All methods for the detection of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors are based on the measurement of inactivation of FVIII in a mixture of the test plasma containing the putative inhibitor and an exogenous source of FVIII. Various types of assays have been developed since the first inhibitor was described in 1941. Nowadays, two methods are preferably used, the Bethesda assay and the Nijmegen assay. Although the Nijmegen assay shows a better specificity and intra- and interlaboratory variation, it is still hampered by several limitations related to assay characteristics (pH, temperature, and time of incubation), type of control sample, and the von Willebrand factor content of the assay mixture. Epitope specificity plays an important role in the reliability of functional assays because inhibitors against the C2 domain are more difficult to quantify compared with inhibitors against the A2 domain. Finally, lupus anticoagulants can interfere with inhibitor assays, resulting in aberrant results. This report describes in detail the various problems encountered with the assays used in the quantification of functional FVIII inhibitors.
Related Concept Videos
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
