Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate01:20

Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate

Assessment of Ventilation
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment01:30

Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

Pneumonia poses the potential for numerous complications that warrant consideration. These complications include the following:
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm01:29

Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm

Respiratory Depth
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation01:23

Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation

Ventilators are essential medical equipment used to aid patients with respiratory difficulties. Their primary function is to assist or replace spontaneous breathing by providing mechanical ventilation. There are two general classes of mechanical ventilators: negative-pressure and positive-pressure ventilators.
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation01:19

Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation

Besides the pressure difference between the external environment and the lungs, the airflow rate and ease of pulmonary ventilation are also influenced by three other factors: surface tension of the fluid in the alveoli, compliance of the lungs, and airway resistance.
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation01:23

Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) are essential methods in respiratory care. These ventilation techniques offer unique benefits for patients with various respiratory conditions, providing adequate support without requiring intubation. Let's explore how each method is crucial in improving patient outcomes and enhancing respiratory therapy.
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Procalcitonin Testing in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Test First, Treat Later: Could Shifting the Pneumonia Treatment Paradigm Help Us Better Realize the Potential Benefits of Rapid Molecular Panels?

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Can better oral care reduce non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia?

The Lancet. Infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Rethinking How We Provide Guidance When Evidence is Limited.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Impact of Procalcitonin Testing on Antibiotic Use in Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Multi-Hospital Cohort Study.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Hospital Admission Screening for Candidozyma auris: Comparative Cost-Impact of Workflow Strategies.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of a Practical Approach to Prevent Respiratory Infection Outbreaks in Long-Term Care Settings: The CARES Strategy.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Advancing the science of hydrogen peroxide disinfection.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Enterprise Risk Management-Based Framework for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Implementation Study.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Occupational Mpox in Personal Protective Equipment-Compliant Registered Nurse Reinforces Importance of CDC 21-Day Self-Monitoring After Patient Care.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Simulation-based outbreak training and large language models in infection prevention and control education.

American journal of infection control·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
04:32

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Published on: June 28, 2018

Interobserver variability in ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance.

Michael Klompas1

  • 1Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02245, USA. mklompas@partners.org

American Journal of Infection Control
|February 23, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Assessing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) showed high variability between infection control staff and physicians. Different diagnostic approaches led to significantly different VAP case counts, highlighting a need for standardized VAP assessment.

More Related Videos

Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
05:39

Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Published on: May 26, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
04:32

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Published on: June 28, 2018

Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
05:39

Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Published on: May 26, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Healthcare Quality

Background:

  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant healthcare-associated infection.
  • Accurate diagnosis of VAP is crucial for appropriate treatment and patient outcomes.
  • Existing diagnostic methods may lead to variability in VAP identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interobserver variability in diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia.
  • To compare VAP diagnoses made by infection control personnel using CDC criteria versus a physician using clinical judgment.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of 50 ventilated patients.
  • Independent evaluation by three infection control personnel and one physician.
  • Infection control personnel used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria.
  • Physician used independent clinical judgment.

Main Results:

  • Infection control personnel identified between 11 and 20 VAP cases (kappa = 0.40).
  • The physician diagnosed 7 VAP cases.
  • A significant difference in VAP case identification was observed between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • There is high interobserver variability in the assessment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
  • Standardized diagnostic criteria and methods are needed to improve VAP diagnosis consistency.
  • Further research should focus on refining VAP diagnostic guidelines to reduce variability.