Interobserver agreement of the TASC II classification for supra- and infrainguinal lesions

A Zimmermann1, H Wendorff, T Schuster

  • 1Clinic of Vascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675 München, Germany.

Insights

Interobserver agreement for TASC II classification in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was assessed. Consultants showed higher agreement than residents, and surgeons agreed more than radiologists, particularly for femoro-popliteal lesions.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Document (TASC) provides treatment guidelines for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) based on lesion classification.
  • Accurate TASC classification is crucial for optimal patient management.
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is a key imaging modality for evaluating PAD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the interobserver agreement of the TASC II classification for peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) using MRA.
  • To compare agreement levels between different levels of expertise (residents vs. consultants) and specialties (radiology vs. vascular surgery).

Main Methods:

  • Three hundred arterial segments from 149 patients with PAOD evaluated via MRA.
  • Independent grading of TASC II classification by a radiology resident, a radiology consultant, and a vascular surgery consultant.
  • Statistical analysis using generalized estimation equation models and weighted kappa coefficient (kappa) to quantify agreement.

Main Results:

  • Overall interobserver agreement for TASC II classification was good to excellent among consultants.
  • Consultants demonstrated significantly higher agreement than residents (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.86).
  • Surgeons showed significantly higher agreement than radiologists (OR: 1.43), and agreement was better for femoro-popliteal regions than aorto-iliac regions (OR: 1.64).

Conclusions:

  • While TASC II classification shows good agreement among experienced clinicians, particularly consultants, its complexity may limit daily clinical utility.
  • Simplifying the TASC II classification could enhance its practicality and consistency in routine clinical practice for PAOD management.
Abstract