Comparison of dissolution properties of 2 enteric-coated formulations containing mycophenolate sodium: Myfortic vs

A Esquivel1, R González-Ramírez, J Alberú

  • 1Departamento de Farmacologia, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados el Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.

Transplantation Proceedings
|February 23, 2010
PubMed

Insights

This study compared Myfortic and Femulan enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium tablets. Femulan showed significantly lower and more variable drug release, indicating it is not bioequivalent or suitable for transplant patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Drug Formulation

Background:

  • Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium tablets aim to minimize gastric side effects.
  • Mycophenolate sodium is crucial for immunosuppression in organ transplantation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the pharmaceutical quality and dissolution profiles of Myfortic and Femulan, two enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium formulations.
  • To assess the bioequivalence and clinical suitability of the generic Femulan compared to the innovator Myfortic.

Main Methods:

  • Two enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium 360 mg formulations (Myfortic and Femulan) were analyzed.
  • Drug content and impurity levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography.
  • Dissolution testing was performed at pH 1.2 (stomach) and pH 6.8 (small intestine) using USP apparatus 2.

Main Results:

  • Both formulations met label claim for mycophenolate sodium content and had no detectable impurities.
  • At pH 1.2, drug release was <2% for both. At pH 6.8, Myfortic released 104.9% (range 104.0%-105.6%) vs. Femulan's 62.3% (range 51.3%-67.7%).
  • Femulan exhibited statistically significant lower drug release (P=.04) and unacceptable intratablet variability (32.0% vs. 1.02% for Myfortic).

Conclusions:

  • Femulan and Myfortic are not equivalent enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium formulations.
  • Femulan's inadequate and variable drug release suggests insufficient absorption and potential for suboptimal immunosuppression.
  • Femulan does not meet pharmaceutical quality standards for clinical use in organ transplantation.

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism01:21

Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism

Polymorphism refers to the existence of a drug substance in multiple crystalline forms, known as polymorphs. Recently, this term has been expanded to include solvates (forms containing a solvent), amorphous forms (non-crystalline forms), and desolvated solvates (forms from which the solvent has been removed).
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:22

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Generic intravenous (IV) drugs are considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts due to their 100% bioavailability upon administration. However, variations in stability among different drug products can significantly influence their therapeutic performance, even if they are pharmaceutically equivalent.Cefuroxime, a prophylactic antimicrobial, is often used as a single-dose IV injection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A 3 g dose typically provides...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Alternative Methods01:17

In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Alternative Methods

Alternative drug dissolution methods include the rotating bottle, intrinsic dissolution test, peristalsis, and the Franz diffusion cell method. The rotating bottle method involves meticulously rotating tightly capped controlled-release beads in a temperature-controlled bath. Periodic decanting of samples allows for residue assay, followed by refilling with fresh medium and testing at various pH levels to emulate the gastrointestinal tract conditions.In contrast, the intrinsic dissolution test...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I01:13

In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I

Compendial dissolution methods are standardized procedures defined by pharmacopeias to evaluate the rate at which a drug dissolves in a specific medium. These methods ensure batch-to-batch consistency, enable quality control, and support the prediction of drug bioavailability. They are critical for both immediate and modified-release drug products.The apparatuses used for dissolution testing differ in their design and mechanical function, but all aim to simulate the physiological environment of...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison01:14

Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison

The acceptance criteria for dissolution profile data are anchored in Q values, representing the percentage of drug dissolved within a specified period. This assessment unfolds in three stages:First Stage: The test passes if all six drug dosage units are equal to or greater than Q plus 5%; otherwise, the sample proceeds to the second stage.Second Stage: The average of twelve units must be equal to or greater than Q, with no unit falling below Q - 15% to pass; if not, it progresses to the final...
Formulation and Manufacturing Process: Physical Attributes of Generic Tablets and Capsules01:18

Formulation and Manufacturing Process: Physical Attributes of Generic Tablets and Capsules

Bioequivalence in generic drugs, such as tablets and capsules, refers to their pharmaceutical equivalence to the brand-name counterparts. However, for therapeutic equivalence, manufacturers must also consider physical attributes like size, shape, and weight (FDA Guidance for Industry, December 2003). Discrepancies in these aspects could impact patient compliance and cause medication errors. For instance, swallowing difficulties, often experienced with larger tablets or capsules, can lead to...