Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
[Paradoxes in the judicial institution concerning decision-making in pediatric oncology]
1Service de Pédiatrie, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet 2, 151 Avenue de Saint Antoine Ginestière, Nice cedex 3, France. sirvent.n@chu-nice.fr
Insights
In pediatric oncology, medical decisions involve life-or-death stakes. Legal paradoxes arise between prioritizing a child's survival and respecting parental autonomy in treatment refusal cases.
Area of Science:
- Medical ethics
- Pediatric oncology
- Legal medicine
Context:
- Decision-making in pediatric oncology is complex, balancing life prognosis with ethical and legal considerations.
- Treatment refusal by families or patients presents significant challenges within the medical and legal systems.
- The legal framework exhibits paradoxes concerning the supreme value of biological survival versus patient autonomy.
Purpose:
- To analyze the ethical and legal paradoxes in pediatric oncology decision-making, particularly concerning treatment refusal.
- To explore the conflict between the legal imperative to preserve a minor's life and the principle of patient autonomy.
- To examine the divergence between legal statutes and judicial interpretation in pediatric cancer care.
Summary:
- The law prioritizes a child's biological survival, obligating physicians to provide essential care, contrasting with adult patient autonomy.
- Legal texts permit overriding parental authority for a minor's health, yet jurisprudence hesitates to dictate optimal cancer treatment strategies.
- This creates a complex ethical landscape where the child's right to life intersects with familial and medical decision-making.
Impact:
- Highlights critical ethical dilemmas in pediatric cancer treatment refusal.
- Informs legal and medical professionals on navigating complex decision-making processes.
- Underscores the need for clearer legal and ethical guidelines in pediatric oncology.
Abstract:
In paediatric oncology, the medical decision-making process is characterized by the importance of what is at stake: the vital prognosis. Refusal of care, or, more specifically, refusal of a treatment, always appears "at the crossroads of multiple stakes... implicating an entourage [family members], a medical team, and rules of law that sometimes give rise to contradictory interpretations". Paradoxes in the judicial institution are evident on two levels: i) in the values established by the law; where adults are concerned, the law explicitly refuses to consider the biological survival of an individual as the supreme value; it gives priority to respect of the patient's wishes and his or her autonomy; for children, in contrast, the supreme value established by the law is biological survival; the physician must provide the care indispensable to protect the health of a minor at all cost; ii) between legal texts and jurisprudence; while the law authorizes a physician to override the parental authority when he judges a treatment necessary to protect the health of a minor, jurisprudence in pediatric oncology has always declined to define the best therapeutic strategy where a child's chances of survival are concerned.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:27Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:30Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
01:19Standards of Care II