Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form?

S Grossberg1

  • 1Center for Adaptive Systems, Boston University, Massachusetts 02215.

Perception & Psychophysics
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

A new FM symmetry principle explains parallel visual processing systems (V1-V2, V1-MT) for static and motion forms. This symmetry governs cell organization, enabling contrast-invariant and motion-sensitive perception, and explaining visual illusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The hippocampus and cerebellum in adaptively timed learning, recognition, and movement.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Cortical synchronization and perceptual framing.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

A self-organizing neural model of motor equivalent reaching and tool use by a multijoint arm.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Neural Representations for Sensorimotor Control. III. Learning a Body-Centered Representation of a Three-Dimensional Target Position.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Neural networks: introduction to the 1 December 1987 issue of Applied Optics.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

ART 2: self-organization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns.

Applied optics·2010

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Visual perception
  • Cortical systems

Background:

  • Existing visual processing theories often propose independent modules.
  • The computational basis for parallel visual pathways (V1-V2, V1-MT, V1-V2-MT) remains incompletely understood.
  • Understanding the processing of static and moving visual forms requires explaining differences in their perceptual geometries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze computational properties explaining the existence of parallel cortical systems for static and moving visual form perception.
  • To introduce and apply a novel FM symmetry principle to understand the organization of visual cortical systems.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms underlying visual illusions and perceptual states like resonance and reset.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of computational properties governing sustained and transient cell interactions.
  • Application of the FM symmetry principle to model the organization of on-cells and off-cells.
  • Explanation of emergent boundary segmentation in static and motion form systems.
  • Analysis of gated dipole opponent processes and antagonistic rebound for perceptual phenomena.

    • Main Results:

    • FM symmetry predicts the organization of parallel cortical systems (V1-V2, V1-MT, V1-V2-MT).
    • The static form system (static BCS) generates contrast- and motion-insensitive boundary segmentations.
    • The motion form system (motion BCS) generates contrast-insensitive but motion-sensitive boundary segmentations.
    • FM symmetry explains differing geometries in static and motion perception and accounts for visual illusions (e.g., MacKay, waterfall) and apparent motion aftereffects via antagonistic rebounds.
    • Antagonistic rebounds balance perceptual states of resonance (feature binding) and reset (image change termination).

    Conclusions:

    • The FM symmetry principle provides a unified framework for understanding parallel visual processing.
    • Specialized subsystems interact dynamically, challenging theories of independent processing modules.
    • The proposed mechanisms explain feature binding, perceptual stability, and the computation of complex visual phenomena like motion in depth and illusory contours.