Related Experiment Videos
Maxillary advancement for mandibular prognathism: indications and rationale.
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|May 1, 1991
Summary
Maxillary advancement surgery offers an alternative to traditional mandibular setback for treating mandibular prognathism. This approach restores facial harmony and skeletal volume, avoiding soft tissue support issues.
Area of Science:
- Maxillofacial surgery
- Orthognathic surgery
- Craniofacial reconstruction
Background:
- Traditional mandibular prognathism correction involves mandibular setback, potentially reducing facial volume and soft tissue support.
- This can lead to undesirable aesthetic outcomes like loss of skeletal definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate maxillary advancement as an alternative surgical technique for mandibular prognathism.
- To assess the aesthetic and skeletal outcomes of this approach.
Main Methods:
- 18 patients with mandibular prognathism underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement.
- Genioplasty was performed concurrently to address vertical chin height and/or lateral shift.
- Cephalometric analysis and clinical follow-up (mean 16.2 months) were used to assess outcomes.
Main Results:
- Maxillary advancement restored maxillomandibular harmony and facial convexity without sacrificing skeletal volume.
- Patients exhibited well-supported soft tissues and defined skeletal features post-surgery.
- Cephalometric data indicated persistent mandibular enlargement and anterior facial divergence, yet overall facial proportion was achieved.
Conclusions:
- Maxillary advancement is a viable and effective surgical option for selected patients with mandibular prognathism.
- This technique preserves skeletal volume and enhances soft tissue support, leading to improved aesthetic results.
- It provides an alternative to mandibular setback, addressing skeletal disproportion while maintaining facial aesthetics.