Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal Assessment of Joint Health in Paediatric Haemophilia Using the HEAD-US Ultrasound Scoring System: The ULTRA Study.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

EEG Connectivity Signatures in Active vs. Passive Mental Fatigue Settings.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

PANTHER Challenge Report: Cross-Domain Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Beyond target lesions: Prognostic value of longitudinal AI-derived whole-body [<sup>1</sup>⁸F]FDG PET/CT metrics in metastatic melanoma.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

MRIgRT real-time target tracking: TrackRAD2025 challenge report.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Sepsis associated with Clostridioides difficile infection carries similar mortality to sepsis of other origin: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

Mismatch task conditions and error related ERPs.

Irene S Karanasiou1, Charalabos Papageorgiou, Eleni I Tsianaka

  • 1Institute of Communications and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechneiou str, 15773 Zografou Campus, Athens, Greece. ikaran@esd.ece.ntua.gr

Behavioral and Brain Functions : BBF
|February 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mismatch conditions in auditory tasks influence error detection, as indicated by the N200 component of event-related potentials (ERPs). Larger frequency differences between tones increase N200 amplitude, reflecting an error signal related to attention reorientation.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • The N200 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) is a recognized indicator of error monitoring.
  • Understanding error-related responses in auditory tasks is crucial for cognitive research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how mismatch conditions affect responses in an auditory identification task.
  • To examine the relationship between these responses and the N200 component of stimulus-locked ERPs.

Main Methods:

  • An auditory identification task involved participants matching tones to a slider position.
  • ERPs were recorded from 14 healthy volunteers using 32 leads.
  • Mismatch conditions were created by varying frequencies of consecutive tones.

Main Results:

  • Erroneous responses were influenced by mismatch conditions, particularly large frequency differences.
  • Erroneous trials exhibited significantly greater negativity in the N200 time window (164-191 ms) at fronto-central electrodes (Cz, Fz).
  • LORETA analysis localized maximal activation differences to the frontal lobe.

Conclusions:

  • The fronto-central N200 component is an index of error signaling, activated when comparing actual and required responses.
  • N200 amplitude is modulated by the relationship between consecutive auditory stimuli.
  • This suggests the N200 reflects an "reorientation of attention" mechanism during error processing.