Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Charlson comorbidity index using administrative database in incident PD patients
1Division of Nephrology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) calculated from administrative data accurately predicts outcomes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This administrative method (A-CCI) offers a simpler, valid alternative to manual record review (R-CCI) for assessing patient survival risk.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Epidemiology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is significantly influenced by comorbid conditions.
- The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a recognized predictor of survival in ESRD patients.
- Current CCI assessment often relies on time-consuming medical record reviews.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of using administrative database International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes for calculating CCI.
- To establish a more straightforward method for determining CCI compared to manual review.
- To assess the utility of administrative CCI (A-CCI) in predicting outcomes for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
Main Methods:
- Incident PD patients (N=134) from 1997-2007 were analyzed.
- CCI scores derived from administrative data (A-CCI) were compared with those from medical records review (R-CCI).
- Correlation, sensitivity, and specificity of A-CCI were assessed against R-CCI and patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- A-CCI and R-CCI demonstrated high correlation (r=0.88, p<0.01), with similar mean scores (5.3 vs 5.4).
- A-CCI showed high sensitivity for most comorbidities, though lower for chronic pulmonary and peptic ulcer disease.
- Mortality rates across low, moderate, and high comorbidity groups showed consistent trends between A-CCI and R-CCI, indicating predictive validity.
Conclusions:
- CCI scores derived from administrative ICD-10 data closely mirror those from medical record reviews.
- This administrative approach provides a simple and valid method for predicting outcomes in incident PD patients.
- The A-CCI method offers a practical alternative for risk stratification in ESRD populations.
Related Concept Videos
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...