Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon is a cognitive experience characterized by a temporary inability to retrieve specific information from memory despite having a strong feeling of knowing the information. Although individuals cannot access the target word or detail, they frequently recall related elements, such as its initial letter, syllable count, or context. This partial retrieval often causes frustration, as one might recognize a familiar face or know that a name starts with a specific...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Can natural scenes cue attention to multiple locations? Evidence from eye-movements in contextual cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026

Same author

Differences in Corneal Structure and Biomechanics between Sexes across Age Groups.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2026

Same author

Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Neural correlates of unconscious processing in functional magnetic resonance imaging: does brain activity contain more information than can be consciously reported?

Neuroscience of consciousness·2025

Same author

Response to comment on 'Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness'.

eLife·2025

Same author

Systemic factors in young human serum influence <i>in vitro</i> responses of human skin and bone marrow-derived blood cells in a microphysiological co-culture system.

Aging·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Irrelevant words trigger an attentional blink.

Timo Stein¹, Jan Zwickel, Maria Kitzmantel

¹Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. timo.stein@bccn-berlin.de

Experimental Psychology

|February 25, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Salient distractor words trigger an attentional blink (AB) regardless of shared features with the target. Feature overlap amplifies attentional capture but does not worsen the AB effect itself.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content

Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content

Published on: May 26, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content

Using Electroencephalography Measurements and High-quality Video Recording for Analyzing Visual Perception of Media Content

Published on: May 26, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Visual Attention

Background:

The attentional blink (AB) is a deficit in detecting a second target when it appears soon after a first target.
Previous research suggested that salient distractors sharing features with the target exacerbate the AB.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether salient distractor words induce an attentional blink (AB) independently of feature overlap with the target.
To determine the specific role of feature overlap in distractor-induced AB.

Main Methods:

Two experiments utilized rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of false font strings.
A color-highlighted irrelevant distractor word was presented before the target at varying temporal lags.
Target identification accuracy was measured under conditions with and without feature overlap between distractor and target.

Main Results:

Target identification was significantly reduced at short temporal lags, indicating an AB effect, irrespective of feature sharing.
Feature sharing between the distractor and target led to reduced target accuracy across all lags.
Feature overlap did not amplify the AB but had an additive effect on attentional capture by the distractor.

Conclusions:

Salient distractor words can independently trigger an attentional blink (AB) without requiring feature overlap with the target.
Feature overlap enhances attentional capture by distractors but does not modulate the magnitude of the AB itself.
These findings refine our understanding of the mechanisms underlying attentional blink and distractor processing in visual attention.