Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
04:45
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Should all excised surgical specimens be examined microscopically? A case report
Thomas M Raymond1, Sam Ibrahim, Pradeep S Basnyat
1Surgical Department, William Harvey Hospital, Kennington Road, Ashford, Kent, UK. PRADEEP.BASNYAT@ekht.nhs.uk.
Cases Journal
|February 26, 2010
Summary
Routine microscopic examination of surgical specimens can yield unexpected findings, significantly altering patient care. Histopathological analysis of all tissues warrants consideration due to its potential benefits.
Area of Science:
- Pathology
- Surgical Oncology
- Histopathology
Background:
- The necessity of routine microscopic examination for all surgical specimens remains a subject of debate within the medical community.
- Current practices vary, leading to inconsistencies in diagnostic thoroughness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the importance of comprehensive histopathological examination of surgical tissues.
- To present case studies demonstrating the impact of unexpected findings on patient management.
- To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of routine tissue examination.
Main Methods:
- Review of two clinical cases where histopathological examination of surgical specimens led to significant findings.
- Analysis of patient management and treatment changes resulting from these findings.
Main Results:
- Unexpected histopathological results were identified in two distinct surgical cases.
- These findings directly influenced and altered the subsequent management and treatment plans for the patients involved.
Conclusions:
- Histopathological examination of all surgical tissues should be strongly considered for all patients.
- Routine examination offers potential benefits that may outweigh the drawbacks, improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
