Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
[Prognostic value of functional assessment at admission in an emergency short-stay unit]
Cesareo Fernández Alonso1, Francisco Javier Martín Sánchez, Manuel Fuentes Ferrer
1Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España. cesareofa@hotmail.com
Introduction:
To determine the prognostic value of functional impairment on the final destination of elders admitted for acute medical illness to an emergency short-stay unit (ESSU).
Material And Methods:
We performed a prospective analysis of patients aged more than 65 years old admitted to the ESSU of Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid in April 2008. A protocol was designed that included epidemiologic variables (age and gender), clinical variables (reason for admission, comorbidity measured by the Charlson Index [CI]) and functional variables (previous, admission and functional decline [FD] measured with the Barthel [BI] and Lawton Indexes [LI]). The prognostic value of FD on the decision to admit patients was analyzed through ROC curves and the cut points that maximized sensitivity and specificity were determined.
Results:
Sixty patients were included with a mean age of 80.7 (SD 8.2) years and 71.7% were women. The reasons for admission were acute infections in 31.7%, heart failure in 23.3%, syncope in 15.0%, intestinal obstruction in 11.7%, gastrointestinal bleeding in 10.0%, and arrhythmias in 8.3%. The mean CI was 2.27 (1.45). Functional assessment was as follows: mean previous BI score: 79.25 (SD 25) and at admission: 62.92 (SD 28.19). Mean previous LI score: 4.85 (SD 2.45) and at admission: 2.98 (SD 2.42).): BI-FD: 20% (1.25-38.23), LI-FD 37.5% (16.7-70.2%). FD was found in 100% of the patients. The mean length of stay was 1.70 (SD 0.62) days. Discharge destination was home discharge in 46.7% and hospitalization unit in 53.3%. Multivariate analysis according to discharge destination (home vs hospitalization) provided the following results : BI-FI > or = 16% (OR=7.99 [1.1-60.5], p=0.037), LI-FI > or =35% (OR=19.6 [0.04-0.52], p <0.0001).
Conclusions:
Patients with significant FD in the emergency room should not be admitted to an ESSU since significant FD is a prognostic factor for transfer to a conventional ward.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Planning Nursing Care I
