Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial
1Department of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1009, USA. jacob-oleson@uiowa.edu
This study introduces a Bayesian statistical method to evaluate individual treatment effectiveness using pre- and post-treatment test scores. The approach models performance changes, offering a robust way to assess individual patient improvement.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Analysis
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Assessing individual treatment efficacy is crucial for clinical practice.
- Existing methods may not adequately capture performance changes in single subjects.
- Performance is often measured by percent correct scores in pre- and post-treatment tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present a Bayesian statistical framework for evaluating individual treatment improvement.
- To model changes in percent correct scores from pre- to post-treatment.
- To provide clinicians with a method for assessing single-subject treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Bayesian approach with binomial and beta distributions to model test performance.
- Developed three models: equal pre- and post-test proportions, independent proportions, and correlated proportions.
- Employed posterior predictive distributions and calculated 95% credible intervals for performance changes.
Main Results:
- The study provides methods to calculate credible intervals for post-treatment scores based on pre-treatment performance.
- Demonstrated the application of these methods using data from a cochlear implant trial.
- The Bayesian framework allows for nuanced assessment of individual performance gains.
Conclusions:
- The proposed Bayesian methods offer a statistically sound approach to evaluating individual treatment effects.
- These methods are applicable to various clinical scenarios involving pre- and post-test performance data.
- The study enhances the ability to precisely measure and interpret individual patient progress.
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals
A confidence...
Binomial Probability Distribution
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
Confidence Coefficient
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

