Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
What should be used for baselines against which to compare treatments' effectiveness?
Merton S Krause1, Wolfgang Lutz
1Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany. msk514@msn.com
Establishing ethical baselines for psychotherapy research is crucial. Current control groups are inadequate; existing effective treatments and optimal mental health should define comparison standards for evaluating new psychotherapies.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) commonly rely on control groups to establish treatment efficacy.
- Existing control groups in psychotherapy research often fail to provide ethically sound or clinically meaningful lower baselines.
- Determining the natural course of psychological maladies is ethically and practically challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose ethically appropriate and clinically meaningful baselines for evaluating psychotherapy effectiveness.
- To challenge the adequacy of conventional control groups in psychotherapy research.
- To advocate for a revised framework for assessing the value of psychotherapies.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of control group methodologies in clinical trials.
- Ethical considerations in establishing research baselines for psychological treatments.
- Comparative analysis of potential lower and upper bound baselines for psychotherapy efficacy.
Main Results:
- Standard control groups in RCTs do not offer ethically viable lower baselines for psychotherapy.
- The natural course of illness is not a feasible or ethical baseline for comparison.
- Existing ethically sound treatments serve as a necessary lower baseline.
- Optimal mental health represents the ideal upper baseline for evaluating treatment outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Psychotherapy research must adopt ethically sound lower baselines, preferably existing effective treatments.
- New psychotherapies should be evaluated against both existing treatments and the ideal of optimal mental health.
- This approach ensures a more rigorous and clinically relevant assessment of therapeutic value.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blind Procedures
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.