Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Noninferiority trial design and analysis with an ordered three-level categorical endpoint
1Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. ebrittain@niaid.nih.gov
This study introduces a new method for noninferiority trial design using a three-level ordered endpoint. It presents sample size calculations and compares this approach to traditional binary endpoints for clinical trial planning.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Statistical Methodology
Background:
- Standard noninferiority trial designs typically use binary endpoints.
- Extending these designs to ordered, multi-level outcomes is crucial for capturing nuanced results.
- Existing methods may not fully leverage information from ordered categorical data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend noninferiority trial design methodology to accommodate ordered three-level endpoints.
- To propose a metric for summarizing outcomes on such endpoints and present sample size requirements.
- To compare the proposed three-level endpoint approach with collapsed binary endpoints.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel metric to summarize outcomes for an ordered three-level endpoint (e.g., success, intermediate, failure).
- Derived sample size requirements for noninferiority trials using this metric.
- Analyzed the implications of collapsing the three-level endpoint into two distinct binary endpoints.
- Compared noninferiority margins and sample size needs between the three-level and binary approaches.
Main Results:
- A metric for ordered three-level endpoints in noninferiority trials was proposed.
- Sample size requirements for this new methodology were calculated.
- The study identified differences in noninferiority margins and sample size needs when comparing the three-level endpoint to collapsed binary endpoints.
Conclusions:
- The proposed methodology offers a more informative approach to noninferiority trials with ordered outcomes.
- Using a three-level endpoint can provide a more precise assessment compared to collapsing data into binary outcomes.
- This work provides guidance on selecting appropriate endpoints and sample sizes for complex trial designs.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...

