Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
Why we disagree to disagree: a reply to commentaries by Robertson and McGilly, and Lindsay
Frank C P van der Horst1, Rene van der Veer
1Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands. fhorst@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Abstract:
In this contribution the authors reply to two commentaries - published in this issue - on their earlier paper discussing the changing attitudes towards the care of children in hospital in the UK between 1940 and 1970. They argue that the work of Robertson and Bowlby was indeed very important in bringing about these changes, but stand firm that the work of Robertson and Bowlby was not new or decisive.
Related Concept Videos
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Cognitive Dissonance
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
