Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
Published on: May 14, 2020
Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective
T Bradley Edwards1, Joanne E Labriola, Rodney J Stanley
1Fondren Orthopedic Group, Texas Orthopedic Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. bemd@fondren.com
Background:
Modern cementing techniques have improved glenoid fixation, reduced glenoid lucency seen with keeled components, and may eliminate differences attributable to glenoid design. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of glenoid design on immediate and follow-up radiographic lucency of pegged and keeled glenoid components, using modern cementing techniques.
Material And Methods:
Fifty-three total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized prospectively to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies.
Results:
On immediate radiographs, there was no significant difference in the rate of glenoid lucency between pegged (0%) and keeled (15%) glenoid components (P = .128). However, after an average of 26 months, the rate of glenoid lucency was significantly higher in patients with keeled components (46%) compared to patients with pegged components (15%) (P = .003).
Conclusion:
Even with modern cementing techniques, pegged glenoid components remain radiographically superior to keeled glenoid components.