Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
06:23
Laparoscopic-Assisted Seldinger Technique for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion
Published on: May 23, 2025
Blind peritoneal access during laparoscopy: why is it still being used?
Mahmoud Abu-Amara1, Charles Akle, Mohan Adiseshiah
1The London Clinic, London, United Kingdom.
International Surgery
|March 2, 2010
Summary
Closed pneumoperitoneum induction for laparoscopy nearly caused a fatality. An open technique could have prevented this complication, raising questions about the safety of current closed methods for gaining peritoneal access.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Access Techniques
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Laparoscopy is a common diagnostic and therapeutic surgical procedure.
- The initial step involves gaining access to the peritoneal cavity and insufflation.
- This crucial step is expected to be the safest part of the procedure.
Observation:
- A case is presented where closed induction of pneumoperitoneum led to a near-fatal event.
- The complication could have been averted by employing an open surgical technique.
- Endovascular therapy was required to manage the patient's life-threatening injuries.
Findings:
- Closed pneumoperitoneum induction carries significant risks, including potentially fatal complications.
- Open access techniques may offer a safer alternative for establishing pneumoperitoneum.
- The presented case highlights a critical safety concern in a routine surgical step.
Implications:
- Rethinking the routine use of closed pneumoperitoneum induction in laparoscopic surgery is warranted.
- Enhanced training and consideration of open techniques may improve patient safety during laparoscopic procedures.
- Further research is needed to compare the safety profiles of open versus closed techniques for pneumoperitoneum induction.
