Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of
Cristina Costa-Santos1, João Bernardes, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos
1Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. csantos@med.up.pt
Objective:
To compare the interpretation of agreement in the prediction of neonatal outcome variables, using the limits of agreement (LA) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Study Design And Setting:
Three obstetricians were asked to predict neonatal outcomes independently based on the evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic tracings. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the LA and the ICC, and the results obtained were interpreted by six clinicians and six statisticians on a scale that established agreement as very poor, poor, fair, good, or very good.
Results:
Interpretation of the LA results was less consensual than the ICC results, with proportions of agreement of 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.44) vs. 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.73), respectively. LA results suggested a fair to good agreement among obstetricians, whereas interpretation of ICC results suggested a poor to fair agreement. LA results were more plausible with reality, suggesting that obstetricians predicted neonatal outcomes better than randomly generated values, whereas it was not always the case with the ICC.
Conclusions:
LA and ICC can provide inconsistent results in agreement studies. Accordingly, in the absence of better strategies to assess agreement, both should be used for this purpose, but their results need to be interpreted with caution keeping their respective limitations in mind.
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
