Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why the Environmental Data & Governance Initiative is archiving public environmental data.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

The multiple process model of goal-directed aiming/reaching: insights on limb control from various special populations.

Experimental brain research·2020
Same author

On Whether Task Experience of the Peer Differentially Impacts Feedback Scheduling and Skill Acquisition of a Learner.

Frontiers in psychology·2019
Same author

Testosterone influences volitional, but not reflexive orienting of attention in human males.

Physiology & behavior·2017
Same author

Extending Energy Optimization in Goal-Directed Aiming from Movement Kinematics to Joint Angles.

Journal of motor behavior·2017
Same author

The multiple process model of goal-directed reaching revisited.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Determining the temporal limits of a visual sample for visual regulation.

Steve Hansen1

  • 1Department of Physical Education and Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada. shansen@brocku.ca

Journal of Motor Behavior
|March 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Even brief visual input, as short as 40 milliseconds, can significantly improve aiming accuracy and reduce movement time. Knowing when this visual information will occur enhances its effectiveness in refining motor control.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • * Motor Control and Human Performance
  • * Visual Perception and Action

Background:

  • * Understanding the role of visual feedback in refining motor skills is crucial for optimizing human performance.
  • * Previous research suggests vision impacts movement accuracy and duration, but the minimal effective visual sample duration remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To determine the minimum visual sample duration required to enhance aiming accuracy and decrease movement time.
  • * To investigate the influence of predictable versus unpredictable visual sample timing on motor task execution.

Main Methods:

  • * Participants performed aiming movements, controlling the timing and duration of visual samples (40 ms, 30 ms, 20 ms, 10 ms, or 0 ms) via a switch press.
  • * Experiment 1 assessed accuracy and movement duration under unknown visual sample durations.
  • * Experiment 2 evaluated performance when the visual sample duration was known prior to movement initiation.

Main Results:

  • * Accuracy decreased significantly in the no-vision (0 ms) condition compared to conditions with visual samples, particularly when sample duration was unpredictable.
  • * A 40 ms visual sample was sufficient to reduce endpoint variability when its duration was known beforehand.
  • * Short visual samples demonstrably improved both accuracy and movement efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • * Even very brief visual samples can enhance motor control, leading to increased aiming accuracy and reduced movement duration.
  • * Knowledge of the impending visual context significantly modulates the effectiveness of visual feedback on motor behavior.
  • * These findings have implications for designing training paradigms and understanding human-computer interaction in tasks requiring precise motor skills.