Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
09:14

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: December 30, 2025

Stringent patient selection in bulk allograft reconstructions.

Judd Cummings1, Erland Villanueva, David Cearley

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. judcummi@iupui.edu

Orthopedics
|March 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BRD9 Degraders Unleash GBAF Chromatin Remodeling Activity in Synovial Sarcoma.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Development and Structural Characterization of UTE-156, a Covalent Inhibitor of the VCP/p97 AAA+ ATPase.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

BAF complex-independent gene activation by SS18::SSX.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Synovial sarcoma reprograms transcription by GBAF activation of polycomb targets and loss of CBAF enhancers.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The fibroblast epigenome underlies SS18::SSX-mediated transformation in synovial sarcoma.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on periprosthetic infection in orthopaedic oncology : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2025
Same journal

Preoperative Copper-to-Zinc Ratio and Postoperative Delirium After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Supracondylar Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Early Experiences Comparing the Retrograde Nail With Locking Attachment Washer (LAW) Plate to Traditional Fixation Techniques.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Intra-Articular Vancomycin Powder in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for the Management of Primary Bone Tumors of the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

A Modified Keshishyan Index Demonstrates Three-dimensional Assessment of Asymmetry in Pediatric Pelvic Fractures.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Planned Versus Intraoperative Vascular Surgery Consultations in Orthopedic Oncology.

Orthopedics·2026
See all related articles

Stringent patient selection for large bulk structural allografts in limb preservation did not significantly reduce complication rates compared to previous studies. Further research is needed to optimize outcomes for these complex reconstructions.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Musculoskeletal Oncology

Background:

  • Large bulk structural allografts are utilized for limb preservation in various orthopedic procedures.
  • Allograft failure can result from infection, fracture, and nonunion, influenced by patient comorbidities and social factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if stringent patient selection criteria for bulk structural allografts in limb preservation can improve outcomes and reduce complication rates.
  • To evaluate the impact of specific patient characteristics on allograft survival and functional scores.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 23 patients meeting strict selection criteria (age <50, non-smoker, BMI <40, no perioperative radiation) underwent intercalary or osteoarticular allograft reconstruction.
  • Patient outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) scoring systems.

More Related Videos

Procurement for a Vascularized and Reinnervated Abdominal Wall Allotransplantation
09:30

Procurement for a Vascularized and Reinnervated Abdominal Wall Allotransplantation

Published on: July 18, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
09:14

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Published on: December 30, 2025

Procurement for a Vascularized and Reinnervated Abdominal Wall Allotransplantation
09:30

Procurement for a Vascularized and Reinnervated Abdominal Wall Allotransplantation

Published on: July 18, 2025

Main Results:

  • The overall allograft survival rate was 91% (21/23).
  • Average MSTS and TESS scores were 76% and 87%, respectively.
  • Eleven patients (48%) experienced complications requiring revision surgery, with no significant difference in complication rates compared to previously reported studies.

Conclusions:

  • Stringent patient selection for bulk structural allografts in limb preservation did not demonstrate an appreciable reduction in complication rates in this early experience.
  • Functional outcomes, as measured by MSTS and TESS scores, were comparable to existing literature, but complication rates warrant further investigation.