Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Word meaning in minds and machines.

Psychological review·2021
Same author

People's sensitivity to content vs. formal properties of visual stimuli: Evidence from category construction.

Acta psychologica·2019
Same author

On Fodor's First Law of the Nonexistence of Cognitive Science.

Cognitive science·2019
Same author

The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.

Memory & cognition·2019
Same author

Contrasting Semantic versus Inhibitory Processing in the Angular Gyrus: An fMRI Study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2018
Same author

Does practice in category learning increase rule use or exemplar use-or both?

Memory & cognition·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Uncertainty in category-based induction: when do people integrate across categories?

Gregory L Murphy1, Brian H Ross

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. gregory.murphy@nyu.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary

People use multiple categories for uncertain inductions, but only when the primary category is ambiguous. Cognitive shortcuts and individual differences influence this category-based induction strategy.

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Decision-Making
  • Category Theory

Background:

  • Investigates category-based induction, a key aspect of human cognition.
  • Addresses the debate on whether people use single or multiple categories for uncertain items.
  • Highlights limitations of previous methods in assessing category use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how individuals perform category-based induction with uncertain categorizations.
  • To introduce a novel method for classifying trial responses as single- or multi-category based.
  • To understand the factors influencing the use of single versus multiple categories.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new methodology to differentiate between single- and multi-category induction responses.
  • Conducted two experiments to test category-based induction under varying levels of category ambiguity.
  • Analyzed individual differences in strategy selection.

Main Results:

  • Participants employed multi-category induction when the most likely category was ambiguous.
  • Multi-category use was rare when the most likely category provided an unambiguous induction.
  • Evidence suggests a cognitive shortcut, involving consultation of only one information source, contributes to single-category focus.

Conclusions:

  • Category-based induction is flexible, with individuals adapting their strategy based on category ambiguity.
  • Cognitive shortcuts and individual differences play a significant role in strategy selection.
  • The use of multiple categories is a selectable strategy, not the default for most category-based induction tasks.