Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The disputed role of knowledge in truth illusions: A critical test based on comparative judgments.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Cognitive processes underlying the repetition-based truth effect: A diffusion model study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

All types of recognition errors are (at least partly) attributable to misleading memory evidence, even false alarms.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Comment on: Probabilities of conditionals: The relevance effect might be confounded by the existence of boundary cases (2025) by Zhan and Wang.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Modeling truncated and censored data with the diffusion model in Stan.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Rethinking Knowledge's Impact on the Illusory Truth Effect.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Conditional reasoning in context: a dual-source model of probabilistic inference.

Karl Christoph Klauer1, Sieghard Beller, Mandy Hütter

  • 1Institut fur Psychologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany. klauer@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a dual-source model for conditional inference, integrating logical form and prior knowledge. Findings show how rule validity and form influence reasoning, offering a new perspective on cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Conditional inference is a fundamental cognitive process.
  • Existing models often struggle to account for the interplay between formal logic and background knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a dual-source model of probabilistic conditional inference.
  • To investigate how logical form and prior knowledge interact during reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a dual-source probabilistic model.
  • Empirical testing through experiments manipulating perceived sufficiency, necessity, rule validity, and rule form (if-then vs. only-if).
  • Analysis of data from the negations paradigm to assess model fit and polarity bias.

Main Results:

  • Perceived sufficiency and necessity directly influence the weight of prior knowledge.
  • Emphasizing rule validity shifts inference towards logical form.
  • Rule form (if-then vs. only-if) specifically impacts form-based evidence parameters.
  • The model successfully explains data from the negations paradigm, including polarity bias.

Conclusions:

  • The dual-source model offers a parsimonious explanation for conditional inference.
  • Reasoning is a dynamic interplay between decontextualized logical structure and content-activated prior knowledge.
  • The model provides a unified framework for understanding various phenomena in conditional reasoning.