Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models00:57

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of a familiarization critical speed testing session on critical speed determination during treadmill running.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Working alliance, daily activities, and emotions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and treating staff: a study with the experience sampling method.

Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)·2025
Same author

Cardiovascular and peripheral factors affecting the decay of maximal oxygen uptake across the spectrum of age in humans.

European journal of applied physiology·2025
Same author

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Predicting Future Performance in Powerlifting: A Machine Learning Approach.

Sports medicine - open·2025
Same author

Cardiocirculatory and Metabolic Responses to Low- and High-Load Squat Exercise in Young and Middle-Aged Individuals.

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
07:09

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise

Published on: February 20, 2017

Algorithms, modelling and VO₂ kinetics.

Carlo Capelli1, Capelli Carlo, Michela Cautero

  • 1Department of Visual and Neurological Sciences, School of Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of Verona, Via Felice Casorati 43, 37131, Verona, Italy. carlo.capelli@univr.it

European Journal of Applied Physiology
|March 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares algorithms for estimating breath-by-breath (B-by-B) alveolar O(2) transfer (VO 2A). Algorithms like Busso and Robbins (BR) and Grønlund (G) improve VO2 kinetics analysis during exercise transitions.

More Related Videos

Optimize Flue Gas Settings to Promote Microalgae Growth in Photobioreactors via Computer Simulations
14:33

Optimize Flue Gas Settings to Promote Microalgae Growth in Photobioreactors via Computer Simulations

Published on: October 1, 2013

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
09:24

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
07:09

Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise

Published on: February 20, 2017

Optimize Flue Gas Settings to Promote Microalgae Growth in Photobioreactors via Computer Simulations
14:33

Optimize Flue Gas Settings to Promote Microalgae Growth in Photobioreactors via Computer Simulations

Published on: October 1, 2013

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
09:24

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

Published on: January 28, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Exercise Science

Background:

  • Estimating alveolar O(2) transfer (VO 2A) breath-by-breath (B-by-B) is crucial for understanding gas exchange.
  • Various algorithms exist, each with unique assumptions and limitations regarding alveolar volume (V Ai-1).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize and critically evaluate different algorithms for B-by-B VO 2A estimation.
  • To compare their precision, impact on exercise transition kinetics, and suitability for studying gas exchange dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of algorithms including Auchincloss (A), Busso and Robbins (BR), Grønlund (G), and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP).
  • Analysis of how each algorithm handles alveolar volume (V Ai-1) and its effect on VO 2A calculation.
  • Evaluation of algorithm performance during exercise transitions and steady-state conditions.

Main Results:

  • All methods provide unbiased steady-state VO2 estimates, but precision varies.
  • BR and G algorithms enhance signal-to-noise ratio, reducing required exercise repetitions for VO2 kinetics studies.
  • OEP and G show promise for tracking early VO2 kinetics changes during exercise transitions, despite technical challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Algorithm choice impacts the precision and kinetic parameters of B-by-B VO2A measurements.
  • BR and G offer advantages in studying exercise VO2 kinetics by improving measurement quality.
  • OEP and G are promising for advanced B-by-B gas exchange research, particularly in dynamic conditions.