Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
Adjusting a Traverse01:12

Adjusting a Traverse

In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys01:30

Types of Global Positioning System Surveys

GPS surveying methods vary in application, accuracy, and data collection techniques, catering to diverse surveying and mapping needs. Static GPS, kinematic GPS, and real-time kinematic (RTK) surveying are widely used. Each technique offers distinct advantages.Static GPS involves placing one receiver at a known reference point and another at the target point. It collects exact positional data by observing multiple satellite ranges over an extended period, achieving centimeter-level accuracy for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Calibration-free 3D-2D surface registration for image guided intervention.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

The impact of localization and registration accuracy on estimates of deep brain stimulation electrode position in stereotactic space.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Towards Seamless Integration of Magnetic Tracking Into Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same author

In Vivo Laparoscopic Image De-Smoking Dataset, Evaluation, and Beyond.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2025
Same author

Virtual fluoroscopy for interventional guidance using magnetic tracking.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2025
Same author

Electrode Design for Internal Electric Field Delivery to Brain Tumors: Considering Electrical Power and Dynamic Field Shaping.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same journal

Physiology-guided Self-supervised Learning for Simultaneous Dual-Tracer PET Separation.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

Informed-Exploration Reinforcement Learning for Automated Virtual Coronary Intervention Planning.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

4D Reconstruction of Fetal Left Ventricle from Echocardiography via 2.5D Radial Segmentation and Graph-Fourier Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

Generalised Medical Phrase Grounding.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

EndoLRMGS: Combining Large Reconstruction Modelling and Gaussian Splatting for Complete Endoscopic Scene Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same journal

A Neural-Analytical Fusion Scatter Correction Method for Multi-Source CT Using Equivalent High-Order Scatter.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

Target tracking errors for 5D and 6D spatial measurement systems.

Andrew D Wiles1, Terry M Peters

  • 1Department of Medical Biophysics, The University of Western Ontario, and the Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, N2V 1C5, Canada. awiles@ndigital.com

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
|March 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Magnetic tracking systems measure 5D transformations, but tool tip uncertainty (TTE) is not well-defined. This study models TTE using systematic bias and fiducial localizer error (FLE) for improved image-guided surgery accuracy.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

Direct Linear Transformation for the Measurement of In-Situ Peripheral Nerve Strain During Stretching
06:26

Direct Linear Transformation for the Measurement of In-Situ Peripheral Nerve Strain During Stretching

Published on: January 12, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

Direct Linear Transformation for the Measurement of In-Situ Peripheral Nerve Strain During Stretching
06:26

Direct Linear Transformation for the Measurement of In-Situ Peripheral Nerve Strain During Stretching

Published on: January 12, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging and Image-Guided Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgical Navigation Systems

Background:

  • Magnetic tracking systems are increasingly used in image-guided surgery (IGS), measuring 5D transformations.
  • Combining two 5D sensors can yield 6D transformations, similar to optical tracking, but tool tip uncertainty (TTE) estimation is lacking.
  • Existing methods lack a standardized approach for quantifying TTE, hindering precise uncertainty assessment in IGS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and validate mathematical models for estimating the target tracking error (TTE) in magnetic tracking systems.
  • To provide a framework for quantifying measurement uncertainty in image-guided surgery (IGS) systems.
  • To establish a basis for improving the accuracy and reliability of surgical navigation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed mathematical expressions to model TTE based on systematic bias, fiducial localizer error (FLE), and target location.
  • Validated the derived TTE models using extensive Monte Carlo simulations.
  • Assessed the sufficiency of first-order approximations for TTE modeling within typical IGS error ranges.

Main Results:

  • Successfully derived and validated models for TTE in magnetic tracking systems.
  • Demonstrated that first-order approximations are adequate for TTE estimation in common IGS scenarios.
  • Showcased applications of the TTE models in minimally invasive intracardiac surgery and needle-based therapy systems.

Conclusions:

  • The developed TTE models provide a crucial framework for estimating total system measurement uncertainty in IGS.
  • These models, alongside existing target registration error (TRE) models, enhance the quantitative assessment of surgical navigation system performance.
  • Future research will focus on developing TRE models for other registration methods to further refine uncertainty estimation.