Determinants of childhood burns in rural Bangladesh: A nested case-control study

Saidur R Mashreky1, Aminur Rahman, Tabassum F Khan

  • 1Centre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. mashreky@ciprb.org

Insights

Childhood burn is a major risk in rural Bangladesh, especially for young children. Key risk factors include open cooking areas, traditional kerosene lamps (kupi bati), and nuclear family structures.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Environmental Health

Background:

  • Burns are a significant cause of childhood illness in Bangladesh, particularly affecting 1- to 4-year-olds.
  • Rural children face a higher risk of burn injuries compared to their urban counterparts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify specific risk factors contributing to childhood burn injuries in rural Bangladesh.
  • To inform targeted prevention strategies for burn injuries in vulnerable populations.

Main Methods:

  • A nested case-control study was conducted in three rural sub-districts of Bangladesh.
  • The study population comprised children under 10 years of age.

Main Results:

  • Lack of a separate kitchen (OR 1.65) and kitchens without doors increased burn risk.
  • Traditional kerosene lamps (kupi bati) were a major determinant (OR 3.16), with reduced use lowering risk.
  • Children in nuclear families had a higher risk compared to those in combined families.

Conclusions:

  • Open cooking areas and kerosene lamps are primary drivers of childhood burns in rural Bangladesh.
  • Combined family structures are associated with reduced burn risk.
  • Preventing childhood burns involves restricting kerosene lamp use, limiting child access to cooking areas, and promoting combined families.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Burn Injuries01:22

Burn Injuries

Burn injuries occur when the skin and underlying tissues are damaged due to exposure to heat, electricity, chemicals, radiation, or friction. They can vary in severity, from minor superficial burns to severe deep burns that can be life-threatening.
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is: