Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thermal waves visualized by holographic interferometry.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Refraction correction in holographic interferometry and tomography of transparent objects.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Perturbation correction for refraction in interferometric tomography.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Holographic imaging of semitransparent droplets or particles.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Holographic interferometry of transparent media using light scattered by embedded test objects.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Heterodyne holographic interferometry: concentration and temperature measurements in gas mixtures.

Applied optics·2010
Same journal

Multifunctional reconfigurable terahertz metasurface based on vanadium dioxide phase transition: achieving broadband absorption and efficient polarization conversion.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-Q-factor electromagnetically induced transparency utilizing quasi-bound states in the continuum in an all-dielectric terahertz metasurface.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Automated stitching interferometry for high-precision metrology of X-ray mirrors.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Experimental demonstration of an approach to designing a metal-dielectric DBR resonant cavity structure.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

High-precision wavefront reconstruction from a single-shot interferogram using a physics-driven hybrid feature calibration network.

Applied optics·2026
Same journal

Ultra-high-Q Fano resonance based on coupled topological corner states in Kagome photonic crystals.

Applied optics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

Statistical analysis of errors in holographic interferometry.

D Nobis, C M Vest

    Applied Optics
    |March 6, 2010
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Measurement errors in holographic interferometry significantly impact small displacement calculations. Accurate fringe-order measurement is crucial, as scanning methods introduce substantial errors in determining vector displacements.

    More Related Videos

    The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
    12:14

    The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

    Published on: August 12, 2013

    Compact Lens-less Digital Holographic Microscope for MEMS Inspection and Characterization
    10:28

    Compact Lens-less Digital Holographic Microscope for MEMS Inspection and Characterization

    Published on: July 5, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

    Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
    05:45

    Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

    Published on: March 31, 2022

    The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
    12:14

    The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

    Published on: August 12, 2013

    Compact Lens-less Digital Holographic Microscope for MEMS Inspection and Characterization
    10:28

    Compact Lens-less Digital Holographic Microscope for MEMS Inspection and Characterization

    Published on: July 5, 2016

    Area of Science:

    • Optical Measurement
    • Metrology
    • Holography

    Background:

    • Holographic interferometry is a sensitive technique for measuring small displacements.
    • Accurate displacement measurement is vital in various scientific and engineering fields.
    • Understanding error sources is key to improving measurement precision.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To statistically analyze the impact of measurement errors on holographic interferometry.
    • To quantify the effect of fringe-order and direction measurement inaccuracies.
    • To provide guidance on minimizing errors in displacement determination.

    Main Methods:

    • Statistical analysis of error propagation.
    • Modeling of measurement uncertainties in holographic interferometry.
    • Graphical representation of standard deviations for different system geometries.

    Main Results:

    • Identified two primary error sources: fringe-order number and illumination/observation directions.
    • Quantified the standard deviations of displacement errors for various holographic configurations.
    • Demonstrated that scanning fringe readout leads to significantly larger errors than absolute fringe order measurement.

    Conclusions:

    • Inaccurate fringe-order measurement is a major contributor to errors in displacement determination.
    • Optimizing illumination and observation geometry can mitigate some errors.
    • Prioritizing absolute fringe order measurement is recommended for higher accuracy in holographic displacement analysis.