Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International Delphi consensus on single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: patient selection, surgical technique, and training.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Effects of a Modified Exposure Claim for an e-Cigarette on Claim Comprehension, Behavioral Intentions, and Risk Perceptions Among US Adult Tobacco Users and Nonusers: Randomized Experimental Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Patterns of flavored e-cigarette use at the time of quitting smoking: comparison between American young adults (18-24 years old) and older adults (> 24 years old).

Harm reduction journal·2025
Same author

Switching and substantial reductions in cigarette consumption concurrent with use of a heated tobacco product among adults who smoke in Czechia: an actual use study.

Harm reduction journal·2025
Same author

A biomechanical analysis of the effectiveness of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for chronic stroke rehabilitation.

Disability and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Respiratory symptoms among e-cigarette users without an established smoking history in the VERITAS cohort.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

Avoidant instructions induce ironic and overcompensatory movement errors differently between and within individuals.

Christopher Russell1, Madeleine A Grealy

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. christopher.russell@strath.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|March 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Avoidant instructions can paradoxically lead to the forbidden action, particularly under cognitive load. This study reveals that individual responses to such instructions vary significantly, highlighting potential experimenter bias in motor control research.

More Related Videos

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Avoidant instructions, intended to prevent specific actions, can paradoxically elicit the very behavior they aim to suppress.
  • The phenomenon of ironic errors, or the
  • rebound effect,
  • is well-documented but its consistency across varying cognitive loads remains under-explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the consistency of ironic errors versus overcompensatory movements when participants are given avoidant instructions under varying cognitive loads.
  • To examine the influence of cognitive load and individual anxiety levels on motor control errors.
  • To identify potential experimenter bias in studies utilizing avoidant instructions.

Main Methods:

  • Forty participants traced an invisible line while avoiding specific cursor movements (up, down, left, right).
  • A cognitive load manipulation was introduced by having participants rehearse seven-digit numbers during half of the trials.
  • Somatic anxiety levels were measured, and participants' movement patterns were analyzed for consistent ironic errors or overcompensatory movements.

Main Results:

  • Under low cognitive load, a majority of participants exhibited consistent error patterns (overcompensatory or ironic), with anxiety levels predicting the type of error.
  • A significant portion of participants (52.5%) shifted their error tendency when cognitive load was increased.
  • While overcompensatory errors were larger than ironic errors, participants making ironic errors reported higher anxiety, indicating a complex interplay between cognitive load, anxiety, and motor control.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness and nature of avoidant instructions in motor control tasks are not consistent and vary significantly between and within individuals, especially under cognitive load.
  • The study highlights the unreliability of avoidant instructions as a method for directing motor control due to inherent individual differences and situational factors.
  • Findings suggest a potential experimenter bias in research relying on avoidant instructions, necessitating careful consideration in experimental design and interpretation.