Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Fetal growth restriction - from observation to intervention
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. abaschat@umm.edu
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental dysfunction has important short- and long-term impacts that may reach into adulthood. Early-onset FGR before 34 weeks' gestation shows a characteristic sequence of responses to placental dysfunction that evolves from the arterial circulation to the venous system and finally to biophysical abnormalities. In this form of FGR safe prolongation of pregnancy is a primary management goal, as gestational age at delivery, birth weight and iatrogenic premature delivery have an important impact on short-term outcome and neurodevelopment. Surveillance intervals should be adjusted based on umbilical artery and venous Doppler studies. Intervention thresholds need to be based on the balance of fetal vs. neonatal risks and therefore critically depend on gestational age. Late-onset FGR presents with subtle Doppler and biophysical abnormalities and therefore poses a diagnostic dilemma. Often unrecognized, term FGR contributes to a large proportion of adverse perinatal outcome. Monitoring intervals should be adjusted based on middle cerebral artery Doppler and fetal heart rate parameters. Delivery timing thresholds can be low. In both forms of FGR neurodevelopmental impacts of placental disease occur before clinical decisions regarding delivery timing arise. This places special emphasis on future preventative studies.
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental dysfunction has important short- and long-term impacts that may reach into adulthood. Early-onset FGR before 34 weeks' gestation shows a characteristic sequence of responses to placental dysfunction that evolves from the arterial circulation to the venous system and finally to biophysical abnormalities. In this form of FGR safe prolongation of pregnancy is a primary management goal, as gestational age at delivery, birth weight and iatrogenic premature delivery have an important impact on short-term outcome and neurodevelopment. Surveillance intervals should be adjusted based on umbilical artery and venous Doppler studies. Intervention thresholds need to be based on the balance of fetal vs. neonatal risks and therefore critically depend on gestational age. Late-onset FGR presents with subtle Doppler and biophysical abnormalities and therefore poses a diagnostic dilemma. Often unrecognized, term FGR contributes to a large proportion of adverse perinatal outcome. Monitoring intervals should be adjusted based on middle cerebral artery Doppler and fetal heart rate parameters. Delivery timing thresholds can be low. In both forms of FGR neurodevelopmental impacts of placental disease occur before clinical decisions regarding delivery timing arise. This places special emphasis on future preventative studies.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Regression Toward the Mean

