Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion sickness. Helping patients tolerate the ups and downs.

M J Ruckenstein1, R V Harrison

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine.

Postgraduate Medicine
|May 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Sensory conflict theory explains motion sickness, but lacks anatomical detail. Effective drug treatments exist for motion sickness, with choices depending on symptom management and side effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acoustic analysis of voice in cochlear implant recipients with post-meningitic hearing loss.

Cochlear implants international·2009
Same author

Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2008
Same author

Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2007
Same author

Middle ear instillation of gentamicin and streptomycin in chinchillas: electrophysiological appraisal of selective ototoxicity.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2002
Same author

Binary partitioning for continuous longitudinal data: categorizing a prognostic variable.

Statistics in medicine·2002
Same author

Contralateral suppression of DPOAE measured in real time.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2002

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vestibular System Research
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • The sensory conflict theory offers a foundational framework for understanding motion sickness.
  • Limited modifications to this model have been proposed since its inception.
  • A key challenge in motion sickness research has been identifying the specific anatomical structures underlying the theory's components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding of motion sickness based on sensory conflict theory.
  • To highlight the need for anatomical delineation of the theory's components.
  • To discuss available pharmacotherapy options for motion sickness.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of sensory conflict theory and motion sickness.
  • Analysis of existing research on anatomical correlates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of pharmacotherapy for motion sickness prophylaxis and treatment.

    • Main Results:

    • The sensory conflict theory remains a valuable model for motion sickness.
    • Definitive anatomical structures linked to the theory's components are not well-established.
    • Pharmacological interventions are effective for managing motion sickness symptoms.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research is needed to map sensory conflict theory components to specific brain regions.
    • Effective pharmacotherapy options exist for motion sickness.
    • Treatment selection requires consideration of prophylactic needs, symptom relief, and drug side effect profiles.