Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Nursing Assessment

Nursing Assessment

The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments and...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Methods to Assess Microbial Communities

Methods to Assess Microbial Communities

Microbial communities, comprising bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotic microorganisms, inhabit diverse ecosystems and play crucial roles in environmental and biological processes. Their diversity is defined by three main parameters: species richness (the number of distinct species), species abundance (the relative quantity of each species), and species evenness (how uniformly individual species are distributed in various locations). These factors together shape the structure and ecological balance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Spatially resolved T cell receptor tracking reveals γδT cell localization to tumor-rich regions in high-risk neuroblastoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Implementing good life with OsteoArthritis from Denmark (GLA:D®) in public outpatient settings in Tasmania, Australia.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2026

Same author

Theoretical Understanding of Target Search Dynamics in Horizontal Gene Transfer in Bacteria.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025

Same author

Caregiver and provider perspectives on developmental services for children with sickle cell disease: a mixed methods analysis.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2025

Same author

The Effect of Individual or Study-Wide Report-Back on Knowledge, Concern, and Exposure-Reducing Behaviors Related to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Environmental health perspectives·2023

Same author

A Phase 1 Two-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of Live, Oral Plasmid-Derived Adenovirus Type 4 and Type 7 Vaccines in Seronegative Adults.

Vaccines·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Assessing process and outcomes: evaluating community-based participatory research.

Marj Plumb¹, Natalie Collins, Janna N Cordeiro

¹Plumbline Coaching and Consulting, Inc.

Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action

|March 9, 2010

Summary

Stronger community-academic partnerships in breast cancer research correlated with better project outcomes. Effective collaboration enhanced research quality and community benefits, suggesting a link worth further study.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

Community-based participatory research
Health services research
Cancer research

Background:

The California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP) funds research through Community Research Collaboration (CRC) Awards.
These awards support partnerships between community members and academic scientists.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between the collaborative process and outcomes in CRC-funded projects.
To understand how partnership dynamics influence research results.

Main Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community and academic partners from seven CRC projects.
Interviews assessed outcomes (methodology, community benefit, researcher benefit, policy impact) and partnership aspects (collaboration, dynamics, community involvement).
Outcome and process scores were compared using scatter plots.

Main Results:

Projects excelled in improving research methodology and benefiting the community and its concerns.
Challenges included collaborative data analysis, power sharing, and managing staff turnover.
Teams with the highest outcome scores also demonstrated the strongest partnership process indicators.

Conclusions:

A positive association was observed between the collaborative process and project outcomes in CRC-funded research.
While not necessarily causal, this relationship warrants further investigation into effective partnership models.