Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF Test
Published on: April 9, 2012
Laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease
Marcus Beissner1, Karl-Heinz Herbinger, Gisela Bretzel
1Department of Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Leopoldstrasse 5, 80802 Munich, Germany. marcus.beissner@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract:
Buruli ulcer disease (BUD), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, has become the third most common mycobacterial disease worldwide. Antimycobacterial therapy is considered the treatment of choice. With the introduction of antimycobacterial treatment, laboratory confirmation of clinically suspected cases became crucial for the clinical management of BUD. Currently available diagnostic laboratory tests include microscopy, culture, histopathology and IS2404 PCR. Several IS2404 PCR assays were applied for case confirmation in endemic countries, and IS2404 PCR is considered the most sensitive method for the laboratory confirmation of BUD. Due to the extended presence of mycobacterial DNA under antimycobacterial treatment, however, PCR is not suitable for monitoring of treatment success. Currently, cultures are considered the only valid confirmatory test for the detection of viable bacilli.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.