Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessment of the added value of basophil activation test in immediate drug allergy diagnosis.

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2026
Same author

Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Continuity corrections with Mantel-Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

S Dias1, N J Welton, D M Caldwell

  • 1Academic Unit of Primary Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6JL, U.K. S.Dias@bristol.ac.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|March 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) synthesize evidence from multiple trials. New methods check consistency between direct and indirect evidence, improving MTC reliability for treatment effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) integrate direct and indirect evidence from randomized trials.
  • MTC is increasingly used to compare multiple treatments and estimate relative effects within a network.
  • Ensuring consistency between direct and indirect evidence is crucial for robust MTC findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and illustrate two novel methods for assessing the consistency of direct and indirect evidence in MTC.
  • To enhance the interpretability of MTC by visualizing how different evidence streams contribute to pooled estimates.
  • To provide tools for identifying potential inconsistencies within treatment comparison networks.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a 'back-calculation' method to infer indirect evidence from direct evidence and MTC output, suitable for pooled summary data.
  • Developed a 'node-splitting' method, a more general approach applicable to trial-level data, separating direct and indirect evidence at each comparison node.
  • Employed a hierarchical Bayesian framework for MTC, implemented using WinBUGS and R.

Main Results:

  • Both back-calculation and node-splitting methods effectively identify inconsistencies in various network structures.
  • These methods visually demonstrate the contribution of direct and indirect evidence to the final MTC estimates.
  • The analyses highlight how MTC synthesizes data and which evidence sources influence the posterior treatment effect estimates.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods offer valuable tools for validating MTC analyses and understanding evidence synthesis.
  • Consistent evidence is essential for reliable relative treatment effect estimations in complex networks.
  • Further considerations include modeling assumptions and the applicability of methods to different data types.