Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic Evaluation of Plasma and Urine Metabolites to Predict the Risk of Adverse Kidney-related Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: The GCKD Study∗.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

TACR3 variant confers resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

mmContext: an open framework for multimodal contrastive learning of omics and text data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Resting-state brain activity and association with physical activity.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same author

[Evidence generation and methodological consultation by the project "EVAluation research based on data from routine clinical care 4 the Medical Informatics Initiative" (EVA4MII)].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

A general, prediction error-based criterion for selecting model complexity for high-dimensional survival models.

Christine Porzelius1, Martin Schumacher, Harald Binder

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. cp@imbi.uni-freiburg.de

Statistics in Medicine
|March 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new method using the integrated prediction error curve (IPEC) offers a reliable alternative for selecting complexity in survival models, especially when predictive partial log-likelihood (PLL) is unavailable.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • High-dimensional data in survival analysis presents challenges in model complexity selection.
  • Overfitting is a significant concern, necessitating robust model selection criteria.
  • Predictive partial log-likelihood (PLL) via cross-validation is a common but not universally applicable method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a relative integrated prediction error curve (IPEC) as an alternative criterion for selecting model complexity in predictive survival models.
  • To compare the performance of IPEC with traditional PLL-based methods, particularly in scenarios where PLL is not available.
  • To assess the impact of using bootstrap resampling versus cross-validation for estimating model performance.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted using microarray survival data to mimic real-world high-dimensional scenarios.
  • The performance of model selection using bootstrap-estimated IPEC was compared against cross-validation-estimated PLL.
  • Bootstrap resampling was also explored as an alternative to cross-validation for estimating PLL.

Main Results:

  • Bootstrap estimation of PLL generally yielded similar prediction performance compared to cross-validation estimates.
  • Model selection using bootstrap-estimated IPEC performed comparably to cross-validation-estimated PLL.
  • The proposed IPEC method proved effective in a real-world microarray survival dataset from diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma patients.

Conclusions:

  • The relative integrated prediction error curve (IPEC) is a viable and stable alternative criterion for model complexity selection in high-dimensional survival analysis.
  • IPEC is particularly advantageous when predictive partial log-likelihood (PLL) is not available or difficult to compute.
  • Bootstrap resampling provides a reliable alternative for estimating performance metrics like IPEC and PLL, ensuring robust model selection.