Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
Reproducibility and validity of a diet quality index for children assessed using a FFQ
Inge Huybrechts1, Carine Vereecken, Dirk De Bacquer
1Department of Public Health, Ghent University, University Hospital 2BlokA, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. inge.huybrechts@ugent.be
Insights
The Diet Quality Index (DQI) for preschoolers is a valid and reproducible tool. This food-based index accurately assesses children's diet quality, correlating with nutrient intake and dietary guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Dietary Assessment
Background:
- Assessing preschooler diet quality is crucial for public health.
- Existing dietary assessment tools may have limitations in capturing overall diet quality.
- Food-based dietary guidelines provide a framework for healthy eating patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the Diet Quality Index (DQI) for preschool children in Flanders.
- To assess the reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ)-based DQI.
- To compare the relative validity of the FFQ-DQI against detailed diet records.
Main Methods:
- Dietary data collected via 3-day estimated diet records and a 47-item parent-reported FFQ.
- DQI scores calculated based on adherence to food-based dietary guidelines.
- Validity assessed by correlating DQI scores with nutrient intakes.
- Reproducibility evaluated through test-retest of the FFQ-DQI.
- Relative validity compared FFQ-DQI to 3-day record DQI.
Main Results:
- Higher 3-day record DQI scores correlated with lower added sugar intake and higher fiber, water, calcium, and micronutrient intake.
- FFQ-DQI test-retest scores showed no significant difference (72 vs. 71).
- FFQ-DQI (71) was significantly higher than 3-day record DQI (66).
- High reproducibility (correlation=0.88) and relative validity (correlation=0.82) were observed for the FFQ-DQI.
Conclusions:
- The FFQ-based DQI is a reproducible and relatively valid method for assessing preschooler diet quality.
- The DQI effectively reflects adherence to dietary guidelines and nutrient intake.
- This tool can be utilized to determine diet quality among young children.
Abstract:
The diet quality index (DQI) for preschool children is a new index developed to reflect compliance with four main food-based dietary guidelines for preschool children in Flanders. The present study investigates: (1) the validity of this index by comparing DQI scores for preschool children with nutrient intakes, both of which were derived from 3 d estimated diet records; (2) the reproducibility of the DQI for preschoolers based on a parentally reported forty-seven-item FFQ DQI, which was repeated after 5 weeks; (3) the relative validity of the FFQ DQI with 3 d record DQI scores as reference. The study sample included 510 and 58 preschoolers (2.5-6.5 years) for validity and reproducibility analyses, respectively. Increasing 3 d record DQI scores were associated with decreasing consumption of added sugars, and increasing intakes of fibre, water, Ca and many micronutrients. Mean FFQ DQI test-retest scores were not significantly different: 72 (sd 11) v. 71 (sd 10) (P = 0.218) out of a maximum of 100. Mean 3 d record DQI score (66 (sd 10)) was significantly lower than mean FFQ DQI (71 (sd 10); P < 0.001). The reproducibility correlation was 0.88. Pearsons correlation (adjusted for within-person variability) between FFQ and 3 d record DQI scores was 0.82. Cross-classification analysis of the FFQ and 3 d record DQI classified 60 % of the subjects in the same category and 3 % in extreme tertiles. Cross-classification of repeated administrations classified 62 % of the subjects in the same category and 3 % in extreme categories. The FFQ-based DQI approach compared well with the 3 d record approach, and it can be used to determine diet quality among preschoolers.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
