Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Size, shape, and stamina: the impact of left ventricular geometry on exercise capacity
Carolyn S P Lam1, Jasmine Grewal, Barry A Borlaug
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Insights
Cardiac structural remodeling, particularly concentric hypertrophy, significantly limits exercise capacity in adults. This pattern is linked to reduced heart function and chronotropic reserve, suggesting reverse remodeling may be beneficial.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Exercise Physiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Exercise capacity is influenced by cardiac function, but the role of structural remodeling is less understood.
- Cardiac geometry, assessed by left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness, can be categorized into distinct patterns.
- Previous research has primarily focused on functional determinants of exercise tolerance, with limited investigation into structural changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between different patterns of cardiac geometry and exercise capacity in a low-risk adult population.
- To determine if specific types of left ventricular remodeling correlate with reduced exercise tolerance.
- To investigate the impact of cardiac structure on physiological responses during exercise.
Main Methods:
- A prospective exercise echocardiography database was used to identify 366 subjects (ejection fraction > or = 50%) without valvular disease, ischemia, or arrhythmias.
- Cardiac geometry was classified into normal, concentric remodeling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy based on left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness.
- Maximal exercise tolerance was assessed using the Bruce protocol, with results measured in metabolic equivalents.
Main Results:
- Exercise capacity, measured in metabolic equivalents, was highest in normal geometry (9.9+/-2.8) and progressively lower in concentric remodeling (8.9+/-2.6), eccentric hypertrophy (8.6+/-3.1), and concentric hypertrophy (8.0+/-2.7) (P<0.02 for all vs. normal).
- Left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness showed negative correlations with exercise tolerance (r=-0.14, P=0.009 and r=-0.21, P<0.001, respectively).
- Augmentation of heart rate and ejection fraction during exercise was blunted in concentric hypertrophy compared to normal geometry, even after adjusting for medications.
Conclusions:
- Ventricular remodeling patterns are significantly associated with exercise capacity in low-risk adults.
- Concentric hypertrophy is linked to the greatest limitation in exercise capacity, primarily due to reduced systolic and chronotropic reserve.
- Strategies aimed at reverse remodeling may hold potential for preventing or treating functional decline in individuals with structural heart disease.
Abstract:
Although several studies have examined the cardiac functional determinants of exercise capacity, few have investigated the effects of structural remodeling. The current study evaluated the association between cardiac geometry and exercise capacity. Subjects with ejection fraction > or = 50% and no valvular disease, myocardial ischemia, or arrhythmias were identified from a large prospective exercise echocardiography database. Left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were used to classify geometry into normal, concentric remodeling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy. All of the subjects underwent symptom-limited treadmill exercise according to standard Bruce protocol. Maximal exercise tolerance was measured in metabolic equivalents. Of 366 (60+/-14 years; 57% male) subjects, 166 (45%) had normal geometry, 106 (29%) had concentric remodeling, 40 (11%) had eccentric hypertrophy, and 54 (15%) had concentric hypertrophy. Geometry was related to exercise capacity: in descending order, the maximum achieved metabolic equivalents were 9.9+/-2.8 in normal, 8.9+/-2.6 in concentric remodeling, 8.6+/-3.1 in eccentric hypertrophy, and 8.0+/-2.7 in concentric hypertrophy (all P<0.02 versus normal). Left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were negatively correlated with exercise tolerance in metabolic equivalents (r=-0.14; P=0.009 and r=-0.21; P<0.001, respectively). Augmentation of heart rate and ejection fraction with exercise were blunted in concentric hypertrophy compared with normal, even after adjusting for medications. In conclusion, the pattern of ventricular remodeling is related to exercise capacity among low-risk adults. Subjects with concentric hypertrophy display the greatest limitation, and this is related to reduced systolic and chronotropic reserve. Reverse remodeling strategies may prevent or treat functional decline in patients with structural heart disease.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be met...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

