Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments?
F Reed Johnson1, Ateesha F Mohamed, Semra Ozdemir
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. frjohnson@rti.org
Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates from discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) may be inaccurate. Cognitive heuristics can cause individuals to misinterpret costs, potentially invalidating WTP as a welfare measure.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Health Economics
- Environmental Economics
Background:
- Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates from discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) commonly assume constant marginal utility of income.
- This assumption aligns with economic theory when costs represent a small portion of total income.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly test the assumption of constant marginal utility of income in DCEs.
- To investigate potential cognitive heuristics that may violate this assumption and impact WTP validity.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of results from five discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) designed to test the marginal utility of income assumption.
- Examination of how subjects recode numerical cost levels into qualitative categories.
Main Results:
- Empirical tests revealed frequent violations of the constant marginal utility of income assumption.
- A cognitive heuristic of recoding costs into categories (e.g., 'low,' 'medium,' 'high') was identified as a likely cause.
- This recoding simplifies choices but undermines the accuracy of WTP estimates as welfare measures.
Conclusions:
- The assumption of constant marginal utility of income in DCEs is often violated due to cognitive recoding of costs.
- This heuristic is particularly relevant in healthcare settings where insurance may distort cost perception.
- Strategies like 'cheap talk' or graphical representations may improve the accuracy of DCE-based WTP estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
What is an Experiment?
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Cognitive Dissonance
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

