Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II

Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II

Rural Health Centers
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

Restorative Care

Restorative Care

Restorative care is provided once a patient has been discharged from a healthcare facility and requires additional services. The additional services include home care, rehabilitation programs, and extended care. Restorative care centers help the patient regain their previous level of functioning or acquire a new level of functioning due to the incapacitating effects of a disease or a disability. It aims to assist patients in enhancing their quality of life by encouraging independence,...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The OMERACT core domain sets for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2026

Same author

Musculoskeletal ultrasound findings in people with asymptomatic hyperuricemia: baseline analysis from the Transitions in Gout Research (TIGER) study using the OMERACT gout ultrasound semiquantitative scoring system.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2026

Same author

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026

Same author

Perceptions About Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and Views About Urate-Lowering Therapy in People With Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia.

Arthritis care & research·2025

Same author

The Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) definition of clinical remission in gout.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2025

Same author

Time Trends and Predictors of Gout Remission Over 6 Years.

Arthritis care & research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Rehabilitation outcomes: values, methodologies and applications.

Kathryn M McPherson¹, William J Taylor, Alain Leplege

¹Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand. kathryn.mcpherson@aut.ac.nz

Disability and Rehabilitation

|March 13, 2010

Summary

Defining good rehabilitation outcomes remains complex. This special issue explores values, novel measurement methods, and practical applications to advance rehabilitation outcome evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Rehabilitation Medicine
Health Outcomes Research
Clinical Evaluation

Background:

Defining 'good' outcomes in rehabilitation is a persistent challenge.
This definition is critical for research, clinical practice, and policy funding.
Despite attention, significant complexity and confusion persist regarding rehabilitation outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To present novel perspectives on long-standing issues in rehabilitation outcomes.
To propose innovative approaches for reconsidering and advancing rehabilitation outcome evaluation.
To address key themes including values, measurement, and application in rehabilitation outcomes.

Main Methods:

The special issue features 10 papers offering fresh insights.
Commentary focuses on key themes discussed by the authors.
Analysis includes the role of values, novel methodologies, and specific applications.

Main Results:

The papers question prevalent assumptions in common outcome evaluation approaches.
Novel ways forward for rehabilitation outcome assessment are proposed.
Key themes explored include the integration of values, innovative measurement techniques, and practical examples.

Conclusions:

The special issue critically examines the evaluation of outcomes in rehabilitation.
Prevalent assumptions underpinning current rehabilitation outcome approaches are challenged.
Novel strategies and perspectives are offered to move the field forward.