Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Weighted Mean

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Actuarial Approach

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Same author

Long-Term Opioid Therapy Tapering and Risk of Substance Use Disorder and Overdose: Differences by Opioid Dose and Duration.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same author

Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates and Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes.

JAMA·2026

Same author

Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Same author

Evaluation of clinical utility in emulated clinical trials.

European journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Inflammatory and cholesterol risks and rates of major cardiovascular events among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in routine care.

European heart journal open·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Estimation of attributable fractions using inverse probability weighting.

Arvid Sjölander¹

¹Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Nobels väg 12, Stockholm, Sweden. arvid.sjolander@meb.ki.se

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

|March 13, 2010

Summary

This study introduces inverse probability weighting as a new method for estimating the attributable fraction, a key measure in epidemiology for understanding disease impact. Simulation results compare its performance against maximum likelihood estimation.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

The attributable fraction is a crucial epidemiological metric for quantifying disease impact from exposures.
Existing estimation methods, such as maximum likelihood estimation, have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and evaluate a novel estimation method for the attributable fraction using inverse probability weighting.
To compare the performance of the inverse probability weighted estimator with the maximum likelihood estimator.

Main Methods:

Development of an estimation method based on inverse probability weighting.
Conducting a simulation study to assess estimator performance.
Comparative analysis of inverse probability weighting and maximum likelihood estimation.

Main Results:

The inverse probability weighted estimator demonstrates utility, particularly when exposure distribution models are well-specified.
Simulation study provides performance data for the new estimator.

Conclusions:

Inverse probability weighting offers a valuable alternative for estimating the attributable fraction in epidemiological research.
The proposed method shows promise, especially in scenarios with accurate exposure modeling.