Microbiological quality assessment of laboratory mice in Korea and recommendations for quality improvement

Yi-Rang Na1, Seung-Hyeok Seok, Hui-Young Lee

  • 1Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and KRF Zoonotic Disease Priority Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Experimental Animals
|March 13, 2010
PubMed

Insights

Laboratory mice in Korea showed high pathogen contamination, especially from conventional breeders and intermediate vendors. Improved quarantine and vendor selection are crucial for research quality control.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Microbiology
  • Laboratory Animal Science
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology

Background:

  • Microbiological quality control is vital for laboratory rodents used in research.
  • Monitoring pathogen prevalence in research animal populations is essential for data integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the prevalence of infectious pathogens in laboratory mice from Korean vendors and research facilities.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current health surveillance and quarantine protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Serological, bacteriological, parasitological, and histopathological examinations were performed.
  • Samples were collected from Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) and conventional mice from commercial breeders and institutional facilities.
  • Data were collected between 2006 and 2007.

Main Results:

  • SPF mice from primary breeders were largely free of targeted pathogens.
  • Mice from an intermediate vendor exhibited Syphacia obvelata and Mycoptes musculinus infections.
  • Conventional mice showed high contamination rates; Mouse Hepatitis Virus (MHV), Sendai virus, and Mycoplasma pulmonis were detected in 23.2%, 8.9%, and 1.8% of institutional animals, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Current quarantine and pathogen eradication efforts in Korean animal facilities are inadequate.
  • Eliminating the use of commercial conventional mice and implementing rigorous vendor selection and quarantine are recommended.
  • Establishing qualified veterinary expert oversight is necessary for robust animal health surveillance programs.

Related Concept Videos