Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
How decisions evolve: the temporal dynamics of action selection.
Stefan Scherbaum1, Maja Dshemuchadse, Rico Fischer
1Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Stefan.Scherbaum@psychologie.tu-dresden.de
Mouse movement trajectories reveal how the brain resolves conflict during decision-making. Previous trial conflict impacts later stages of movement, suggesting efficient re-activation of processing rather than proactive preparation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision-Making Research
- Human Motor Control
Background:
- Traditional methods like response latency and accuracy offer limited insight into the temporal dynamics of conflict resolution.
- Understanding the real-time unfolding of decision-making processes under conflict is crucial for cognitive science.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the temporal dynamics of conflict resolution during decision-making.
- To analyze how conflict on the current and previous trials influences response trajectories.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a continuous spatial conflict task (Simon task) with mouse movement tracking.
- Applied a novel combination of multiple regression and distribution analysis to mouse trajectory data.
Main Results:
- Previous response influenced early mouse trajectory phases.
- Conflict on both previous and current trials significantly affected later trajectory phases.
- Conflict resolution appears to involve efficient re-activation of prior compensatory processing.
Conclusions:
- Mouse movement trajectories provide a richer temporal account of conflict resolution than traditional measures.
- Experiencing conflict may not proactively prime the system, but rather leads to more efficient re-activation of processing when subsequent conflict occurs.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
