Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cancer screening by primary care physicians. Can we explain the differences?

E H Osborn1, J A Bird, S J McPhee

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0900.

The Journal of Family Practice
|May 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Physicians often fall short on recommended cancer screenings. Preventive care visits and reading medical journals significantly improve screening rates, highlighting key areas for intervention.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Expert recommendations.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2020
Same author

Smoking prevalence and factors associated with smoking status among Vietnamese in California.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2010
Same author

A quantitative method for the measurement of cigarette smoke irritation.

The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics·2010
Same author

The inactivation of pteroylglutamic acid (liver Lactobacillus casei factor) by light.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2010
Same author

A failing grade for end-of-life content in textbooks: what is to be done?

Journal of palliative medicine·2005
Same author

Do house officers learn from their mistakes?

Quality & safety in health care·2003

Area of Science:

  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Preventive Health
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Physicians frequently do not adhere to recommended cancer screening guidelines.
  • Adherence to cancer screening protocols remains a significant challenge in primary care settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with cancer screening.
  • To identify factors influencing physicians' adherence to cancer screening recommendations.
  • To measure actual physician screening rates through patient record reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of 40 primary care physicians on cancer screening knowledge and attitudes.
  • Review of patient medical records to determine physician screening rates.
  • Analysis of screening performance scores against American Cancer Society guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Over 80% of physicians agreed on the importance of urging cancer screening.
  • Low compliance rates were observed for six out of seven recommended cancer screening tests.
  • Screening performance varied significantly among physicians, with preventive care visit scheduling and journal readership being key predictors.

Conclusions:

  • A limited set of factors, including visit scheduling and professional reading habits, can explain substantial variation in cancer screening performance.
  • Targeting these predictors may enhance physician adherence to cancer screening guidelines.
  • Further research can optimize interventions to improve cancer screening delivery in primary care.